Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:42:28.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Satellites of Uranus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Dale P. Cruikshank
Dale P. Cruikshank*
Affiliation:
Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Uranian satellite system contains five known members, all of which are difficult to study owing to their faintness and proximity to Uranus. The photometry of these objects is not in a satisfactory state, nor is the photovisual spectrophotometry. Infrared observations are in some sense easier and more precise because Uranus itself is faint in the near infrared and interferes but little with the satellite studies. The near infrared work reveals water ice or frost on the satellite surfaces, perhaps in a very pure state. The satellites are most similar to Ganymede in terms of the strength of the ice bands, but subtle differences, now under study, may be present. The diameters and masses of the satellites, while not readily measurable directly, can be estimated from generalizations about the surface geometric albedos, assumed mean densities, and certain dynamical arguments. Most of the data and theories are consistent with bodies with radii in the range 160-520 km (similar to the larger asteroids) and albedos on the order of 0.5, consistent with ice and snow. The mean densities are probably similar to those of the icy Saturn satellites, about 1.3 g/cm3. Uranus’ satellites probably formed after the event that caused the planet to tilt to the presently observed obliquity.

Type
Present Knowledge of Uranus
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 60: Uranus and the Outer Planets , 1982 , pp. 193 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

References

Alexander, A. F. O’d. 1965. The Planet Uranus (New York: American Elsevier) 300 pp.Google Scholar
Andersson, L. E. 1974. A photometric study of Pluto and satellites of the Jovian outer planets. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Indiana, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Barton, S. G. 1946. The names of the satellites. Pop. Astron. 54., 122–131.Google Scholar
Bell, J. F., Clark, R. N., McCord, T. B., and Cruikshank, D. P. 1979. Reflection spectra of Pluto and three distant satellites. Bull. Amer. Astron. Soa. 11, 572 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Clark, R. N. 1980. Ganymede, Europa, Callisto, and Saturn’s rings: Compositional analysis from reflectance spectroscopy. Icarus 44, 388–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. N., and McCORD, T. B. 1980a. The Galilean satellites: New near-infrared spectral reflectance measurements (0.65 - 2.5 ym) and a 0.325 - 5 ym summary. Icarus 41, 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. N., and McCord, T. B. 1980b. The rings of Saturn: New near-infrared reflectance measurements and a 0.326 - 4.08 ym summary. Icarus 43, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruikshank, D. P. 1980. Near-infrared studies of the satellites of Saturn and Uranus. Icarus 41, 246–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruikshank, D. P., and Brown, R. H. 1981. The Uranian satellites: Water ice on Ariel and Umbriel. Icarus 45, 607–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruikshank, D. P., Pilcher, C. B., and Morrison, D. 1977. Identification of a new class of satellites in the outer solar system. Astrophys. J. 40, 1006–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruikshank, D. P., Stockton, A., Dyck, H. M., Becklin, E. E., and Macy, W. Jr. 1979. The diameter and reflectance of Triton. Icarus 40, 104–114.Google Scholar
Degewij, J., Andersson, L. E., and Zellner, B. 1980a. Photometric properties of outer planetary satellites. Icarus 44, 520–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degewij, J., Cruikshank, D. P., and Hartmann, W. K. 1980b. Near-infrared colorimetry of J6 Himalia and S9 Phoebe: A summary of 0.3- to 2.2-ym reflectances. Icarus 44, 541–547.Google Scholar
Gondolatsch, F. 1965. In Landolt-Bornstein Tables, New Series, eds. Hellwege, K. H. and Voigt, H. H., vol. 1 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) p. 150.Google Scholar
Greenberg, R. 1975. The dynamics of Uranus’ satellites. Icarus 24. 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, R. 1976. The Laplace relation and the masses of Uranus’ satellites. Icarus 29, 427–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, R. 1979. The motions of Uranus’ satellites: Theory and application. In Dynamics of the Solar System, ed. Duncombe, R. L. (Dordrecht: Reidel) pp. 177–180.Google Scholar
Harris, D. L. 1961. Photometry and colorimetry of planets and satellites. In Planets and Satellites, eds. Kuiper, G. P. and Middlehurst, B. M. (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press) pp. 272–342.Google Scholar
Hartmann, W. K., Cruikshank, D. P., Degewij, J., and Capps, R. W. 1981. Surface materials on unusual planetary object Chiron. Icarus, submitted.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. E., Greene, T. F., and Shorthill, R. W. 1978. Narrowband spectrophotometry of Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, Oberon, and Triton. Icarus 36, 75–81.Google Scholar
Kuiper, G. P. 1949. The fifth satellite of Uranus. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 61, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, D., and Cruikshank, D. P. 1974. Physical properties of the natural satellites. Space Sci. Rev. 15, 641–739.Google Scholar
Morrison, D., Cruikshank, D. P., Pilcher, C. B., and Rieke, G. H. 1976. Surface compositions of the satellites of Saturn from infrared photometry. Astrophys. J. Lett. 207, L213–L216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, P. D., and Jones, T. J. 1980. Two-micron spectrophotometry of Uranus and its rings. Icarus 42, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitsema, H. J., Smith, B. A., and Weistrop, D. E. 1978. Visual and near-infrared photometry of the Uranian satellites. Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc. 10, 585 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Singer, S. F. 1975. When and where were the satellites of Uranus formed? Icarus 25, 484–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinton, W. M. 1972. A near-infrared view of the Uranus system. Sky Telesc. 44, 304–305.Google Scholar
Sinton, W. M. 1977. Uranus: The rings are black. Science 198, 503–504.Google Scholar
Smith, B. A. 1977. Uranus rings: An optical search. Nature 268, 32.Google Scholar
Whitaker, E. A., and Greenberg, R. J. 1973. Eccentricity and inclination of Miranda’s orbit. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 165, 15P–18P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar