Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T12:19:21.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relations Between Celestial and Selenocentric Reference Frames

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

J. Kovalevsky*
Affiliation:
CERGA, Grasse (France)

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The very great accuracy with which the motions of the Moon can now be monitored by laser ranging, differential VLBI and occultation observations, implies that the interpretation of the measurements is conditioned by the choice and the accurate knowledge of a selenocentric, a terrestrial and a celestial frames. Two different types of selenocentric reference frames can be envisioned. The present selenographic frames are discussed but the author proposes that one should introduce a system defined by a purely geometric means. Some consequences of such a choice are discussed. One feature of the future conventional terrestrial frame is very important for Earth-Moon dynamics. Its origin should coincide with the center of mass of the Earth as determined by lunar laser ranging. As far as the quasi-inertial reference systems are concerned, the liaisons between a purely lunar dynamical system, subject to some hardly modelable effects, and purely celestial systems are analysed. The reduction of observations made with various techniques implies the use of different systems, and several problems are stated that should be solved before a unique system for Earth-Moon dynamics might be used.

Type
Part IV
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1982

References

Calarne, O.: 1976, The Moon, 15, p. 343.Google Scholar
Calarne, O.: 1977, in Scientific applications of lunar laser ranging, J.D. MuVholland, ed., p. 53.Google Scholar
Ferrari, A.J., Sinclair, W.S., Sjogren, W.L., Williams, O.G. and Yoder, C.F.: 1980, J. Geophys. Res., 85, p. 3939.Google Scholar
Froeschlé, M.: 1977, The Moon, 17, p. 47.Google Scholar
Froechlé, M. and Meyer, C.: 1981, in IAU Colloquium n°56, Warsaw, p. 317.Google Scholar
Gaposchkin, E.M. and Kolaczek, B. ed.: 1981, “Reference Coordinate systems for Earth Dynamics”, IAU Colloquium n°56, D. Reidel Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Guinot, B.: 1981, in IAU colloquium 56, Warsaw, p. 125.Google Scholar
King, R.W., Counselman, C.C.III and Shapiro, I.I.: 1976, J. Geophys. Res., 81, p. 6251.Google Scholar
Kopal, Z. and Carder, R.W.: 1974, “Mapping of the Moon”, D. Reidei Pubi. Co., , Dordrecht, p. 61.Google Scholar
Kovalevsky, J.: 1975, in IAU colloquium 26, Torùn, p. 123.Google Scholar
Kovalevsky, J.: 1981, in IAU colloquium 56, Warsaw, p. 77.Google Scholar
Kovalevsky, J. and Mueller, I.I.: 1981, in IAU colloquium 56, Warsaw, p. 375.Google Scholar
Lambeck, K.: 1980The Earth’s variable rotation: geophysical causes and consequences”, Cambridge Univ. Press, p. 303.Google Scholar
Lyttleton, R.A.: 1980, The Moon and the Planets, 22, p. 13.Google Scholar
Meyer, D.L.: 1980, “Selenocentric control system (1979)”, DMA Technical report, DMA TR 80-001.Google Scholar
Mueller, I.I.: 1981, in IAU colloquium 56, Warsaw, p. 1.Google Scholar
Mulholland, J.D.: 1975, in IAU colloquium 26, Torün, p. 433.Google Scholar
Mulholland, J.D.: 1980, Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, 18, p. 549.Google Scholar
Mulholland, J.D. and Calarne, O.: 1982, IAU Colloquium 63, Grasse, this volume, p. 199.Google Scholar
Schimmerman, L.A.: 1976, “The expanding Apollo control system”, presented at the XVI General Assembly of IUGG, Grenoble.Google Scholar
Seidelmann, P.K., Kaplan, G.H. and Van Flandern, T.C.: 1981, in IAU colloquium 56, Warsaw, p. 305.Google Scholar
Slade, M.A., Preston, R.A., Harris, A.W., Skjerve, L.J. and Spitzmesser, D.J.: 1977, The Moon, 17, p. 133.Google Scholar
Van Flandern, T.C.: 1975, Mon. Not. R.A.S., 170, p. 333.Google Scholar
Van Flandern, T.C.: 1982, IAU Colloquium 63, Grasse, this volume, p. 207.Google Scholar
Williams, J.G.: 1977, in “Scientific applications of Lunar Laser Ranging”, Mulholland, J.D. ed., p. 37.Google Scholar