Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T23:41:07.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Refractive vs Reflective Correctors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

E.H. Richardson  and
C.L. Morbey
E.H. Richardson
Affiliation:
Dominion Astrophyslcal Observatory, 5071 W. Saanich Road, Victoria BC, V8X 4M6, Canada
C.L. Morbey
Affiliation:
Dominion Astrophyslcal Observatory, 5071 W. Saanich Road, Victoria BC, V8X 4M6, Canada

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Improved designs of refractive correctors produce excellent images with fast telescopes such as those with an F/1.5 prime focus and F/3.5 secondary focus. The fields are flat and there is compensation for the chromatic effect caused by windows. Disadvantages of such correctors are that stray light is produced at the optical surfaces, the elements must be supported at their edges, prerequisite high quality glass is available in only limited sizes, and all wavelengths are not transmitted.

Reflective correctors, on the other hand, can produce diffraction limited images at all wavelengths and the mirrors can be supported across their backs as well as at their edges. Disadvantages are that the images are degraded by any substantial window (such as a detector faceplate), there is more central obstruction, and the correctors are sometimes very large and heavy.

Except, perhaps, for a specialized telescope, such as one devoted to multi-object slit spectroscopy using fibres, the refractive corrector is preferable at fast foci.

A good combination is a Ritchey-Chretien (R-C) telescope with refractive correctors at the fast prime and secondary foci, and a reflective corrector-magnifier for the slow infrared focus.

Type
IV. Instrumentation - Components
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 79: Very Large Telescopes, their Instrumentation and Programs , 1984 , pp. 549 - 567
Copyright
Copyright © ESO 1984

References

1. McGraw, J.T., Stockman, H.S., Angel, J.R.P., Epps, H., Williams, J.T., Proc. SPIE, Vol. 331, pl37, March, 1982.Google Scholar
2. Angel, J.R.P., Woolf, N.J., Epps, H., “15 Meter Multiple Herschellian Telescope with Wide Field Paul Corrector,” SPIE Proc. Vol. 332, 1982.Google Scholar
3. Report of the Optical Conference on the 7.6-meter Telescope, ed. Smith, H.J. and Barnes, T.G., Publ, in Astronomy No.22, Univ. of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
4. Mannery, E., Balick, B., University of Washington, private correspondence, 1982.Google Scholar
5. Sampson, R.A., Mon.Not.R.astr.Soc.,73,524, 1913.Google Scholar
6. Wynne, C.G., Ap.J.,(1968)152,675–694.Google Scholar
7. Buchroeder, R.A.,(1974). “A Ray Trace Study of Prime Focus Grisms,” Report of the Optical Sciences Centre, University of Arizona, June 1974.Google Scholar
8. Richardson, E.H., Harmer, C.F.W., Grundmann, W.A., Mon.Not.R.astr.Soc. (1984)206,47–54.Google Scholar
9. Wynne, C.G., Mon.Not.R.astr.Soc.(1974)167,189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Faulde, M, Wilson, R.N., Astron. and Astrophys.(1973)26,11–15.Google Scholar
11. Wynne, C.G., Appl.Opt.(1967)6,1227–1231; Mon.Not.R.astr.Soc.(1973)165,lp-8p.Google Scholar
12. Wynne, C.G., Mon.Not.R.astr.Soc(1972)160, Short Communication.Google Scholar
13. Spencer, G.H., and Murty, M.V.R.K. (1962), J. Opt. Soc. Am., 52, 672.Google Scholar
14. Marquardt, D.W. (1963), J. of SIAM, 11, 431.Google Scholar
15. Odgers, G.J., Grundmann, W.A., ”Very large optical arrays using boule-type telescopes,” SPIE Proc. Vol.444,1983,93–99.Google Scholar