Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T16:45:59.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent near Earth satellite flux data: contributions in the definition of the interplanetary flux at 1 AU heliocentric distance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

J. A. M. McDonnell ,
D. J. Gardner  and
N. McBride
J. A. M. McDonnell
Affiliation:
Unit for Space Science and Astrophysics, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom, CT2 7NR
D. J. Gardner
Affiliation:
Unit for Space Science and Astrophysics, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom, CT2 7NR
N. McBride
Affiliation:
Unit for Space Science and Astrophysics, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom, CT2 7NR

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recently analysed hypervelocity impact data from retrieved satellites are summarised. Analyses of perforation data show that mean densities are low (around 1.5-2 g/cm3), impact velocities are consistent with radar meteor observations and that high aspect ratio particles are not found. Mean data, for Fmax > 30 μm agrees well with the Grün et al. Interplanetary flux model, though there is evidence of a strong bias towards the Earth apex of motion direction. For Fmax < 30 μm the data at LDEF's altitude is dominated by space debris.

Type
VI. Dust Measurements from Earth Orbit
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 150: Physics, Chemistry and Dynamics of Interplanetary Dust , 1996 , pp. 193 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1996

References

Collier, I., (1995) PhD thesis University of Kent at Canterbury.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. J., Collier, I., Shrine, N. R. G., Griffiths, A. D., & McDonnell, J. A. M. (1996) Adv Space Research 17(12) p. 193.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. J. (1995), PhD thesis University of Kent at Canterbury.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. J., McDonnell, J. A. M. & Collier, I. (1995) Int. Jnl of Impact Engineering. In submission.Google Scholar
Grün, E., Zook, H. A., Fechtig, H., & Giese, R. H. (1985) Icarus 62 p.244.Google Scholar
Deshpande, S. P. (1995), PhD thesis University of Kent at Canterbury.Google Scholar
Laurance, M. R. & Brownlee, D. E. (1986) Nature 323 11 p. 136.Google Scholar
McDonnell, J. A. M., (1970) Space Research X.Google Scholar
McDonnell, J. A. M., Sullivan, K. (1992) Hypervelocity Impacts in Space, ed. McDonnell, J.A.M., University of Kent at Canterbury, p. 39.Google Scholar
McDonnell, J. A. M. & Baron, J. M. (1993), LDEF - 69 months in space: Proc. 3rd post retrieval symposium, p.337 Google Scholar
McDonnell, J. A. M. & Gardner, D. J. (1995), Icarus in preparation.Google Scholar
Neish, M. J. (1995), PhD thesis University of Kent at Canterbury.Google Scholar
Öpik, (1951), Proc. Royal Irish Academy 54 p.165.Google Scholar
Ratcliff, P. R., Taylor, A. D. & McDonnell, J. A. M. (1993), Planetary and Space Science, 41(8) p. 603.Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. & Southworth, R. B. (1973), NASA Contractor report CR 2615, Smithsonian Institute, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Sullivan, K. & McDonnell, J. A. M. (1992) Proc. Hypervelocity Impacts In Space, University of Kent at Canterbury, 1-5 July 1991, p. 126.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. D. (1995), Icarus 116 p. 154.Google Scholar
Zook, H. A. (1990), 21st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Abstracts volume p. 1385.Google Scholar