Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T21:29:23.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical Simulations of Interacting Disk Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Masafumi Noguchi
Masafumi Noguchi*
Affiliation:
University of Wales, College of Cardiff Cardiff, United Kingdom

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Galaxy-galaxy interactions have long attracted many extragalactic astronomers in various aspects. A number of computer simulations performed in the 1970s have successfully reproduced the peculiar morphologies observed in interacting disk galaxies and clarified that tidal deformation explains most of the observed global peculiarities. However, most of these simulations have used test particles in modelling the disk component. Tidal response of a self-gravitating disk remains to be further clarified.

Another topic which is intensely discussed at present is the relation between galaxy-galaxy interactoins and activity. Many observations suggest that interactions trigger strong starbursts and possibly active galactic nuclei (AGN). However, the detailed mechanism of triggering is not yet clear. It is vital here to understand the dynamics of interstellar gas.

Type
IX. Theory of Interaction Stimulated Effects
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 124: Paired and Interacting Galaxies , 1990 , pp. 711 - 716
Copyright
Copyright © NASA 1990

References

Arp, H. 1966, Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies (Pasadena: Caltech).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockney, R.W. and Eastwood, J.W. 1981, Computer Simulations Using Particles (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
Keel, W.C., Kennicutt, R.C. Jr., van der Hulst, J.M., and Hummel, E. 1985, Astron. J. 90 708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R.H. and Smith, B.F. 1979, Astrophys. J. 227 785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, S.T. and Scoville, N.Z. 1987, Astrophys. J. Lett. 312, L39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noguchi, M. 1987, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 228 635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noguchi, M. 1988, Astron. Astrophys. 203 259.Google Scholar
Ostriker, J.P. and Peebles, P.J.E. 1973, Astrophys. J. 186 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, W.W. and Hausman, M.A. 1984, Astrophys. J. 277 744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoville, N.Z., Matthews, K., Carico, D.P. and Sanders, D.B. 1988, Astrophys. J. Lett. 327, L61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellwood, J.A. 1981, Astron. Astrophys. 99 362.Google Scholar
Telesco, C.M. and Decher, R. 1988, Astrophys. J. 334 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thronson, H.A. et al. 1989, Astrophys. J. 343 158.Google Scholar
Toomre, A. and Toomre, J. 1972, Astrophys. J. 178 623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar