Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T18:39:44.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hervy Element Abundances Predicted by Radiative Support Theory in the Atmospheres of Hot White Dwarfs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

P. Chayer
Affiliation:
Département de Physique, Université de Montréal
G. Fontaine
Affiliation:
Département de Physique, Université de Montréal
F. Wesemael
Affiliation:
Département de Physique, Université de Montréal

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The surface composition of a white dwarf evolves as a result of the interaction of several mechanisms, the most important of which being gravitational settling. In the early phases of the evolution, theory shows that selective radiative levitation can occasionally defeat settling and, thus, prevent the formation of a pristine pure hydrogen (helium) atmospheric layer in a hot DA (non-DA) white dwarf (Fontaine and Michaud 1979; Vauclair, Vauclair, and Greenstein 1979). The exciting discovery of sharp metallic features in the ultraviolet spectra of several hot DA and non-DA stars alike resulting from the work of several investigators has provided the essential motivation for further theoretical investigations of radiative levitation in the atmospheres of white dwarfs. Additionnal impetus comes from the continuing investigations of hot DA white dwarfs carried out by Bruhweiler and Kondo which have already revealed a most interesting observational pattern of heavy elements in these stars (Bruhweiler 1985). Moreover the recent availability of theoretical equivalent widths of selected astrophysically important ultraviolet metal lines in hot DA white dwarfs (Henry, Shipman, and Wesemael 1985) makes a comparison between theory and observations -in at least this type of stars- a timely and useful exercise.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1989

References

Bergeron, P., Wesemael, F., Michaud, G., and Fontaine, G. 1988, Ap. J., in press.Google Scholar
Bruhweiler, F.C. 1985, Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc., 17, 559.Google Scholar
Bruhweiler, F.C., and Kondo, Y. 1981, Ap. J. (Letters), 248, L123.Google Scholar
Bruhweiler, F.C., and Kondo, Y. 1983, Ap. J., 269, 657.Google Scholar
Chayer, P., Fontaine, G., Wesemael, F. and Michaud, G. 1987, in IAU Colloquium No. 95, The Second Conference on Faint Blue Stars, Philip, A. G. D., Hayes, D.S. and Liebert, J., eds., L. Davis Press, Schenectady, p. 653. Google Scholar
Chayer, P., Fontaine, G., Wesemael, F. and Michaud, G. 1988, in preparation.Google Scholar
Fontaine, G., and Michaud, G. 1979, Ap. J., 231, 826.Google Scholar
Henry, R.B.C., Shipman, H.L., and Wesemael, F. 1985, Ap. J. Suppl., 57, 145.Google Scholar
Michaud, G. 1987, in IAU Colloquium No. 95, The Second Conference on Faint Blue Stars, Philip, A.G.D., Hayes, D.S. and Liebert, J., eds., L. Davis Press, Schenectady, p. 249.Google Scholar
Morvan, E., Vauclair, G., and Vauclair, S. 1986, Astr. Ap., 163, 145.Google Scholar
Vauclair, G., Vauclair, S., and Greenstein, J.L. 1979, Astr. Ap., 80, 79.Google Scholar
Winget, D.E., Lamb, D.Q., and Van Horn, H.M. 1988, in preparation.Google Scholar