Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T16:56:10.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Algols as Limits on Binary Evolution Scenarios

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

M.S. Hjellming
M.S. Hjellming*
Affiliation:
University of IllinoisDepartment of Astronomy Urbana,IL 61801

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Evolutionary scenarios must account for Algol binaries surviving their first phase of mass transfer. The outcome of this phase is dependent upon the rapidity of the initial mass transfer, which can be estimated by calculating the radial reponse of potential progenitors to mass loss. Limits on the donor’s evolutionary state, and its companion mass, can be placed on systems which would transfer mass on a thermal or dynamical timescale. Slower mass transfer rates are necessary for the successful transition to an Algol. Considering 1.5 and 5.0 M⊙ models, the former succeed in case A and Br systems, while the latter can do so only in case A systems. To evolve into an Algol binary, all systems seem to require initial mass ratios near one.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 107: Algols , 1989 , pp. 155 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1989

References

Benson, R.S. 1970, PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
de Greve, J.P. 1988, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Guiricin, G., Mardirossian, F., and Mezzetti, M. 1983, Ap. J. Supp., 52, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjellming, M.S. and Webbink, R.F. 1987, Ap.J., 318, 794.Google Scholar
Iben, I. Jr and Tutukov, A. 1984, Ap.J., 284, 719.Google Scholar
Kraitcheva, Z.T., Popova, E.I., Tutukov, A.V., Yungelson, L.R. 1978a, Astr.Zh., 55, 1176.Google Scholar
Kraitcheva, Z.T., Popova, E.I., Tutukov, A.V., Yungelson, L.R. 1978a, Astr.Zh., 56, 520.Google Scholar
Livio, M. 1988, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B. 1971, Ann. Rev. Astr. Ap., 9, 183.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B. 1976, in IAU Symp. 73, Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems, eds. Eggleton, P., Mitton, S., Whelan, J. (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 75.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B., Ziolkowski, J., and Zytkow, A. 1969, in Mass Loss from Stars, ed. Hack, M. (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 237.Google Scholar
Plavec, M., Kriz, S., and Horn, J. 1969, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 20, 41.Google Scholar
Refsdal, S. and Weigert, A. 1970, Astr. Ap., 6, 426.Google Scholar
Refsdal, S., Roth, M.L., and Weigert, A. 1974, Astr. Ap., 36, 113.Google Scholar
Tout, C.A. and Eggleton, P.P. 1988, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Webbink, R.F. 1979, in IAU Colloquium 53, White Dwarfs and Variable Degenerate Stars, eds. Van Horn, H.M. and Weidemann, V. (Rochester: U. Rochester Press), p.,426.Google Scholar
Webbink, R.F. 1984, Ap.,J., 277, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webbink, R.F. 1985, in Interacting Binary Stars, eds. Pringle, J.E. and Wade, R.A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 39.Google Scholar
Yungelson, L.R., Tutukov, A.V., and Fedorova, A.V. 1988, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, J. 1969, in Mass Loss from Stars, ed. Hack, M. (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 231.Google Scholar