Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T01:31:04.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

5.1 Sources of Interplanetary Dust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Fred L. Whipple
Fred L. Whipple*
Affiliation:
Center for Astrophysics, Harvard College Observatory and Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Attention is centered on cosmic dust measures made by sensors on Pioneers 8 and 9 in Earth-like orbits. The conclusion follows Zook and Berg that the particles are largely “β-meteoroids,” interplanetary impact debris expelled by solar radiation pressure. An analysis of periodic comet orbits and comets observed during the missions failed to yield correlations, except possibly for debris from Comet Encke. A treatment of β-meteoroids from this stream is presented.

Type
5 Dynamics and Evolution
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 31: Interplanetary Dust and Zodiacal Light , 1976 , pp. 403 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1976

References

Berg, O. E. and Grün, E., 1973, Space Research XIII, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1047–1055.Google Scholar
Cook, A. F., Williams, J. T. and Shao, C.-Y., 1972, IN Meteor Research Program, pp. 83–89. Final Report Contract NSR 09-015-33, NASA CR-2109.Google Scholar
Dohnanyi, J. S., 1970, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 3468–3493.Google Scholar
Dohnanyi, J. S., 1972, Icarus, 17, 1–48.Google Scholar
Dohnanyi, J. S., 1973, Evolutionary and Physical Properties of Meteoroids. ed. Hemenway, , Millman, and Cooks, , Wash. DC, NASA, Sp. Rep. 319, 363–374.Google Scholar
Grün, E., Berg, O. E., and Dohnanyi, J. S., 1973, Space Research XIII, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1056–1062.Google Scholar
Hemenway, C. L., Hallgren, D. S. and Schmalberger, D. C., 1972, Nature, 238, 256.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H. J., Fechtig, H., Grün, E. and Kissel, J., 1974, XVH COSPAR at Sao Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H. J., Fechtig, H., Grün, E. and Kissel, J., 1975, Planet, and Spac. Sci., 23, 215–224.Google Scholar
Hörz, F., Brownlee, D. E., Fechtig, H., Hartung, J., Morrison, D. A., Neukum, G., Schneider, E., Vedder, J. F., and Gault, D. E., 1975, Planet, and Spac. Sci., 151–172.Google Scholar
McDonnell, J. A. M., Berg, O. E., and Richardson, F. F., 1975, Planet, and Spac. Sci., 23, 205–214.Google Scholar
Rhee, J. W., Berg, O. E. and Richardson, F. F., 1974, Geophys. Res. Let., 1, No. 8, 345–346.Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z., 1975, CFA Preprint 313.Google Scholar
Whipple, F. L., 1940, Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc, 83, 711–745.Google Scholar
Whipple, F. L., 1955, Ap. J., 121, 750–770.Google Scholar
Whipple, F. L., 1967, “The Zodiacal Light and the Interplanetary Medium,” NASA Sp. Rep. 150, Wash. DC, 409–426.Google Scholar
Zook, H. A., 1975, Private Communication.Google Scholar
Zook, H. A., and Berg, O. E., 1975, Planet, and Spac. Sci., 23, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar