1 This phenomenon has been termed by some ‘neo-nationalism’: Keating, MPlurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era (OUP Oxford 2001);CrossRefGoogle ScholarMcRoberts, KMisconceiving Canada: The Struggle for National Unity (OUP Toronto 1997) 55;Google ScholarMcCrone, D ‘Neo-Nationalism in Stateless Nations’ (2001) Scottish Affairs 3–13;CrossRefGoogle ScholarNairn, TThe Break-Up of Britain: Crisis and Neo-Nationalism (New Left Books London 1977).Google Scholar

2 For Franck, Thomas the phenomenon of neo-nationalism has been termed ‘post-modern neotribalism’:Google ScholarFranck, TFairness in International Law and Institutions (OUP Oxford 1995) 140–1;Google Scholarand for Ignatieff, Michael, it is ‘the narcissism of minor differences’: ‘The Narcissism of Minor Differences’ in Beiner, R (ed) Theorizing Nationalism (State University of New York Press Albany 1999) 91–102.Google Scholar

3 This study is restricted to a specific set of liberal democracies and the author makes no claim as to whether or not this analysis might be applied more generally to other cases of sub-state nationalism.Google Scholar

4 Loughlin, MThe Idea of Public Law (OUP Oxford 2003) 82.Google Scholar

5 ibid 70.

6 The term ‘late sovereignty’ suggests that the age of State sovereignty, even within the European Union, is far from over.Google ScholarWalker, N ‘Late Sovereignty in the European Union’ European Forum Discussion Paper (EUI Florence Robert Schuman Centre 2001). This term is a more accurate description of our age than the often-used and over-stated mantra: ‘post-sovereignty’.Google Scholar

7 Keating, MNations Against the State—The New Politics of Nationalism in Quebec, Catalonia and Scotland (2nd ednPalgrave London 2001) 275.Google Scholar

8 This process of ‘externalization’ takes place whether the aim is statehood, as in the Scottish National Party's ‘independence in Europe’ strategy (Happold, M ‘Independence in or out of Europe? An Independent Scotland and the European Union’ (2000) 49 ICLQ 15–34) or increased autonomy within the State which will also involve enhanced powers of ‘paradiplomacy’, as is to be found in the mainstream Catalan nationalism of the Convergencia i Unio:CrossRefGoogle Scholar‘Catalonians rattle Madrid with bid for sovereign power’ Nash, EThe Independent 26 Mar 2003.Google Scholar

9 Heywood, P ‘Spanish regionalism, a Case Study’ Working Documents in the Study of European Governance, No 2 (CSEG Nottingham 2000) at 12;Google ScholarBörzel, TA ‘From competitive regionalism to co-operative federalism: the Europeanization of the Spanish state of the autonomies’ (2000) 30 Publius 17–142 at 21;CrossRefGoogle ScholarSalmon, TC ‘Oxymorons: The Scottish Parliament, the European Union and International Relations?’ in Salmon, TC and Keating, M (eds) The Dynamics of Decentralization: Canadian Federalism and British Devolution (McGill/Queens University Press Montreal/London 2001) 63–84;Google ScholarHarel, L ‘The International Relations of the National Assembly of Quebec’ (2003) 26 Canadian Parliamentary Review 4–7.Google Scholar

10 Latouche, D ‘“Quebec, See Canada”: Quebec Nationalism in the New Global Age’ in Gagnon, A-G (ed) Quebec: State and Society (2nd ednNelson Canada Scarborough 1993);Google ScholarRequejo, F ‘La acomodación ‘federal’ de la plurinacionalidad. Democracia liberal y federalismo plural en España’, in Fossas, E and Requejo, F (eds) Asimetría federal y estado plurinacional. El debate sobre la acomodación de la diversidad en Canadá, Bélgica y España (Trotta Madrid 1999) 303–44.Google ScholarRequejo, F ‘Political Liberalism in Multinational States: the legitimacy of plural and asymmetrical federalism’ in Gagnon, A, Taylor, C, and Tully, J (eds) Multinational Democracies (CUP Cambridge 2001) 110–32 at 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 A central contention of the article is that sub-state nationalism and separatism are not synonyms.Google Scholar

12 It should be noted from the beginning that any presentation of the Peace of Westphalia of 1648 as the defining moment in the birth of the modern nation-State is of course simplistic and largely inaccurate, but insofar as the term ‘Westphalia’ has passed into common juridical parlance to encapsulate untrammelled State power, it continues to serve as a useful caricature.Google Scholar

13 Walker, N ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’ (2002) 65 Modern Law Review 317–59 at 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Gagnon, A ‘Quebec: The Emergence of a Region-State?’ (2001) Scottish Affairs 14–27 at 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Keating, MNations Against the State (n 7) 46.Google Scholar

16 Beitz, CR ‘Cosmopolitan Liberalism and the States System’ in Brown, C (ed) Political Restructuring in Europe. Ethical Perspectives (Routledge London 1994);Google ScholarWaldron, J ‘Minority Cultures and the Cosmopolitan Alternative’ in Kymlicka, W (ed) The Rights of Minority Cultures (OUP Oxford 1995) 93–119;Google ScholarHeld, D et al. (eds) Global Transformations (Polity Press Cambridge 1999);Google ScholarMoore, M ‘Globalization, Cosmopolitanism, and Minority Nationalism’ in Keating, M and McGarry, J (eds) Minority Nationalism and the Changing International Order (OUP Oxford 2001) 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Habermas, J and Pensky, MThe Postnational Constellation: Political Essays (Polity Press Cambridge 2001) 60.Google Scholar

18 Weiler, JThe EU, the WTO, and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade? (Academy of European Law, EUI Florence/OUP Oxford 2000);Google ScholarCass, DZ ‘The ‘Constitutionalization’ of International Trade Law: Judicial Norm-Generation as the Engine of Constitutional Development in International Trade’ (2001) 12 EJIL 39–75 at 42;CrossRefGoogle ScholarHabermas, J ‘The European Nation-State and the Pressures of Globalization’ (1999) New Left Review 46–59 at 49.Google Scholar

19 Marks, SThe Riddle of all Constitutions: International Law, Democracy, and the Critique of Ideology (OUP Oxford 2000) 76.Google Scholar

20 Hardt, M and Negri, AEmpire (Harvard University Press Cambridge MA 2000) xii (emphasis in original).Google Scholar

21 McCrone, D ‘Neo-Nationalism in Stateless Nations’ (2001) Scottish Affairs 3–13;CrossRefGoogle ScholarHeld, D ‘Farewell to the Nation-State’ Marxism Today (12 1988) 12–17.Google Scholar

22 Christodoulidis, ELaw and Reflexive Politics (Kluwer Dordrecht 1998);CrossRefGoogle ScholarMacCormick, NQuestioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth (OUP Oxford 1999);CrossRefGoogle ScholarWeiler, JThe Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the new clothes have an emperor?’ and other essays on European integration (CUP Cambridge 1999).Google Scholar

23 Ladeur, KH ‘Towards a Legal Theory of Supranationality: The Viability of the Network Concept’ (1997) 3 European Law Journal 33–54;CrossRefGoogle ScholarTully, JStrange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (CUP Cambridge 1995);CrossRefGoogle ScholarCurtin, DMPostnational Democracy (Universiteit Utrecht 1997);Google Scholarand Chalmers, D ‘Postnationalism and the Quest for Constitutional Substitutes’ 27 (2000) Journal of Law and Society 178–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 Gellner, EThought and Change (Weidenfeld & Nicholson London 1964) 169;Google ScholarDeutsch, KNationalism and Social Communication: An Enquiry into the Foundations of Nationality (MIT Press Cambridge 1966);Google ScholarHobsbawm, EJNations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality (CUP Cambridge 1990);Google ScholarAnderson, BImagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Verso London 1991);Google ScholarWeber, MGeneral Economic History (Collier Books New York 1966);Google ScholarBreuilly, JNationalism and the State (2nd ednMUP Manchester 1993).Google Scholar

25 Gellner, ENations and Nationalism (Blackwell Oxford 1983);Google ScholarReinhard, W (ed) Power Elites and State Building (Clarendon Press Oxford 1996);Google ScholarRae, HState Identities and the Homogenisation of Peoples (CUP Cambridge 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 Holmes, SPassions and Constraints: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy (Chicago ILChicago University Press 1995) xi;Google ScholarResina, JR ‘Post-national Spain? Post-Spanish Spain?’ 8 Nations and Nationalism (2002) 377–96 at 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 McCrone, DThe Sociology of Nationalism: Tomorrow's Ancestors (Routledge London 1998) 11;CrossRefGoogle ScholarSmith, ADNationalism and Modernism: A Critical Survey of Recent Theories of Nations and Nationalism (Routledge London/New York 1998) 11–16.Google Scholar

28 MacPherson, JMIs Blood Thicker Than Water?: Crises of Nationalism in the Modern World (Vintage Books Toronto 1998).Google Scholar

29 Hobsbawm, (n 24) 192.Google Scholar

30 Ignatieff, MThe Warrior's Honor: Ethnic War and the Modern Conscience (Metropolitan Books New York 1998);Google ScholarMacPherson, (n 28) 25–6.Google Scholar

31 Loughlin, The Idea of Public Law (n 4) 73.Google Scholar

32 Krasner, SDSovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (OUP Oxford 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33 Paterson, LAutonomy of Modern Scotland (EdinburghUniversity Press 1994).Google ScholarSee also Mitchell, JDBConstitutional Law (2nd ednGreen Edinburgh 1968) 209, and Walker who notes how historically Scotland has been able to use the unitary State to its advantage.Google ScholarWalker, N ‘Constitutionalism in a New Key’ in De Burca, G and Scott, J (eds) The EU and the WTO: Legal and Constitutional Aspects (Hart Publishing Oxford 2001) 112.Google Scholar

34 Fossas, E ‘Asymmetry and Plurinationality in Spain’, Working Paper 167 Institut de Ciéncies Politiques i Socials (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 1999) 6;Google Scholarand Heywood, ‘Spanish regionalism, a Case Study’ (n 9) 6.Google Scholar

35 Moreno, LThe Federalization of Spain (Frank Cass London 2001) 31;Google ScholarHeywood, PThe Government and Politics of Spain (MacMillan London 1995) 162;CrossRefGoogle ScholarColomer, JM ‘The Spanish “state of the autonomies”: non-institutional federalism’ in Heywood, P (ed) Politics and Policy in Democratic Spain (Frank Cass London 1999) 40–52;Google ScholarBörzel, T AStates and Regions in the European Union. Institutional Adaptation in Germany and Spain (CUP Cambridge 2002).Google Scholar

36 Michelmann, H and Soldatos, P (eds) Federalism and International Relations: The Role of Sub-units (Clarendon Press Oxford 1990);Google ScholarAldecoa, F and Keating, M (eds) Paradiplomacy in Action (Frank Cass London 1999);Google ScholarLaitin, D ‘National Identities in the Emerging European State’ in Keating, M and McGarry, J (eds) Minority Nationalism and the Changing International Order (OUP Oxford 2001) 84–113;CrossRefGoogle ScholarMitchell, J and Cavanagh, M ‘Context and Contingency: Constitutional Nationalists and Europe’ in M Keating and J McGarry (eds) op cit 246–63.Google Scholar

37 Leslie, PM ‘Asymmetry: Rejected, Conceded, Imposed’ in Leslie Seidle, F (ed) Seeking a New Canadian Partnership: Asymmetrical and Confederal Options (Institute for Research on Public Policy Montreal 1994) 37–69 at 40.Google Scholar

38 Supra-state organizations such as the EU certainly challenge the constitutional competence as well as the capacity of Member States—Case 6/64, Costa v ENEL [1964] ECR 1141.Google Scholar

39 Aldecoa, F and Keating, M ‘Introduction’ in Aldecoa, F and Keating, M (eds) Paradiplomacy in Action. The Foreign Relations of Subnational Governments (Frank Cass London 1999) 1–16 at 7.Google Scholar

40 Loughlin, The Idea of Public Law (n 4) 94–5.Google ScholarSee also Loughlin, Sword and Scales (Hart Publishing Oxford 1999) 145;Google ScholarBrubaker, RNationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe (CUP Cambridge 1996);CrossRefGoogle Scholarand Mann, M ‘Nation-states in Europe and other continents: diversifying, developing, not dying’ (1993) 122 Daedalus 115–40 at 118.Google Scholar

41 McCrone, D ‘Neo-Nationalism in Stateless Nations’ (n 21) 11.Google Scholar

42 Once again international law remains a powerful force in the defence of State power. For example, out of respect for the principle of territorial integrity, the international community refuses to recognize Kosovo as an independent State even though it is in any meaningful sense a politico-territorial unit entirely separate from the influence of Serbia-Montenegro.Google Scholar

43 Gagnon, A ‘Quebec: The Emergence of a Region-State?’ (n 14) 24.Google Scholar

44 Hirst, P and Thompson, GGlobalization in Question (Polity Cambridge 1996) 190–4.Google Scholar

45 Keating, M ‘Managing the Multinational State: Constitutional Settlement in the United Kingdom’ in Salmon, TC and Keating, M (eds) The Dynamics of Decentralisation (n 9) 21–45 at 23;Google ScholarMcCrone, DThe Sociology of Nationalism (n 27) 182;Google ScholarSaleé, D ‘La Mondialisation et la construction de I'identité au Québec’ in Elbaz, M, Fortin, A, and Laforest, G (eds) Les Frontiéres de I'identité: Modernité et postmodernisme au Quebéc (Les Presses de l'Université de Laval Sainte-Foy 1996).Google Scholar

46 See respectively: SNP Election Manifesto, Apr 2003;Google ScholarDeclaració de Barcelona (Convergencia i Unio Barcelona 1998) 1;Google ScholarYoung, RAThe Struggle for Quebec: From Referendum to Referendum? (McGill-Queen's University Press Montreal/London 1999) 14.Google Scholar

47 Keating, MNations Against the State (n 7) 264.Google Scholar

48 McCrone, D ‘Neo-Nationalism in Stateless Nations’ (n 21) 11.Google Scholar

49 Walker, ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’ (n 13) 345 (emphasis in original).Google Scholar

50 Simpson, GGreat Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order (CUP Cambridge 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51 The use of the term ‘monistic’ here denotes a unitary construction of the internal sovereignty of the State, centred around a singular conception of the demos; it is not used in the technical legal sense to describe the domestic legal order's external relationship to international law.Google Scholar

52 McRoberts, KCatalonia: Nation Building without a State (OUP Toronto 2001) 68.Google ScholarOn the general realignment of sub-state nationalism in the context of Europe, see Jeffrey, C ‘Sub-National Mobilization and European Integration’ 38 (2000) Journal of Common Market Studies (2000) 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53 Young, RAThe Struggle for Quebec: From Referendum to Referendum? (n 46) 24.Google Scholar

54 Simeon, R ‘Recent Trends in Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations in Canada: Lessons for the United Kingdom?’ in Salmon, TC and Keating, M (eds) The Dynamics of Decentralization (n 9) 51;Google ScholarSeymour, M ‘Quebec and Canada at the crossroads: a nation within a nation’ 6 (2000) Nations and Nationalism 227–56 at 245–7CrossRefGoogle Scholarand Newman, WJThe Quebec Secession Reference: The Rule of Law and the Position of the Attorney General of Canada (York University Press Canada 1999) 12.Google Scholar

55 The term ‘nationalist’ is used in a broad sense here to include non-secessionist nationalist parties such as the Scottish Labour Party; the Scottish Liberal Democrats and the Convergencia i Unio in Catalonia.Google Scholar

56 Although the success of these ventures by Catalonia, Quebec, and Scotland have hitherto been very mixed. Balcells, ACatalan Nationalism: Past and Present (MacMillan London 1995) 197.Google Scholar

57 Rokkan, S and Urwin, D ‘Introduction: Centres and Peripheries in Western Europe’ in Rokkan, S and Urwin, D (eds) The Politics of Territorial Identity: Studies in European Regionalism (Sage London 1982) 1–17 at 11;Google ScholarO'Neill, M ‘Great Britain’ (2000) 53 Parliamentary Affairs 69–95;CrossRefGoogle ScholarRomney, PGetting it Wrong: How Canadians Forgot Their Past and Imperilled Confederation (TorontoUniversity Press 1999);CrossRefGoogle ScholarResina, JR ‘Post-national Spain? Post-Spanish Spain?’ 8 (2002) Nations and Nationalism 377–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

58 Young, (n 46) 41.Google Scholar

59 Bond, R and Rosie, M ‘National Identities in Post-Devolution Scotland’ Institute of Governance paper (Institute of Governance, University of Edinburgh 2002);Google ScholarMcCrone, D and Paterson, L ‘The Conundrum of Scottish Independence’ (2002) Scottish Affairs 35–56.Google Scholar

60 McCrone, ‘Neo-Nationalism in Stateless Nations’ (n 21) 9.Google Scholar

61 De Rafael, GH ‘An empirical survey of social structure and nationalistic identification in Spain in the 1990s’ (1998) 4 Nations and Nationalism 35–59,CrossRefGoogle Scholarand Roller, E ‘The March 2000 General Election in Spain’ (2001) 36 Government and Opposition 209–29 at 218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62 Moreno, L ‘Ethnoterritorial concurrence in multinational societies: the Spanish comunidades autonomas’ in Gagnon, A, Taylor, C, and Tully, J (eds) Multinational Democracies (CUP Cambridge 2001) 201–21 at 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

63 Eg during the 1995 referendum campaign, Canada threatened to veto any attempt by an independent Quebec to join NAFTA. See comments by Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, Marcel Massé quoted in The Globe and Mail 10 Dec 1994Google Scholar

64 This argument draws upon the power of institutions as set out by the ‘new institutionalist’ school of political science. Peters, BGInstitutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism (Continuum London 1999).Google Scholar

65 Meadwell, H ‘The Future of Quebec’ (2001) Scottish Affairs 54–64 at 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

66 Eg one way in which the legislative power of the devolved Scottish Parliament is limited is that it may not legislate incompatibly with either EC law or ‘Convention rights’ per the European Convention on Human Rights—(Scotland Act 1998, s 29(2)(d)). Debate on Scotland's future constitutional options will of necessity be framed within these strictures, which also represent the reality for any governmental authority within Europe today.Google ScholarHimsworth, C ‘Rights Versus Devolution’ in Campbell, T, Ewing, K, and Tomkins, A (eds) Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (OUP Oxford 2001);Google ScholarTierney, S ‘Constitutionalising the Role of the Judge: Scotland and the New Order’ (2001) 5 Edinburgh Law Review 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

67 Requejo, F ‘Democratic Legitimacy and National Pluralism’ in Requejo, (ed) Democracy and National Pluralism (Routledge London 2001) 157–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

68 Carens, JHCulture, Citizenship and Community (OUP Oxford 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

69 Buchanan, ASecession: The Morality of Political Divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec (Westview Press Boulder, CO 1991) 10.Google Scholar

70 Catalan arguments for asymmetry within Spain are discussed by: Moreno, LThe Federalization of Spain (Frank Cass London 2001);Google ScholarRequejo, F ‘Federalism and the Quality of Democracy in Plurinational Contexts: Present Shortcomings and Possible Improvements’ Workshop Paper, ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops (ECPR Grenoble 2001);Google Scholarand Villadangos, ES ‘The coexistence between one state and several nationalities and regions: The Spanish Case’ Workshop Paper, ECPR Workshop 23 (ECPR Mannheim 1999). For similar discussions re Canada, see:Google ScholarLeslie, PM (n 37);Google ScholarResnick, P ‘Toward a Multinational Federalism: Asymmetrical and Confederal Alternatives’ in F Leslie Seidle (n 37) 71–94;Google Scholarand McRoberts, K ‘Canada and the multinational state’ (2001) 34 Canadian Journal of Political Science 683–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

71 Various experiments in this regard were attempted during the final years of the Austro-Hungarian empire, see Plasseraud, Y ‘How To Solve Cultural Identity Problems: Choose your own nation’ Le Monde Diplomatique (2000). Such a right of veto has been a firm demand made by Quebec since patriation of the constitution from the UK through the Constitution Act 1982.Google ScholarMcRoberts, KMisconceiving Canada: The Struggle for National Unity (OUP Toronto 1997) 16–17;Google ScholarOliver, P ‘Canada, Quebec and Constitutional Amendment’ (1999) 49 University of Toronto Law Journal 519–610 at 534, and 544 nn 106–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

72 Each of these demands appears in the Barcelona Declaration and in other proposals made by Catalan nationalist parties. Declaració de Barcelona (n 46); Roller (n 61) 211.Google Scholar