Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:47:04.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding Inpatient Perceptions of Indwelling Urinary Catheters Using the Health Belief Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Joshua Quast
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
Mary Jo Knobloch
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin
Erin Patterson
Affiliation:
William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin
Suzanne Purvis
Affiliation:
Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
Daniel Shirley
Affiliation:
Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Nasia Safdar*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin
*
Address correspondence to Nasia Safdar, MD, PhD, 5221 MFCB, 1685 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53705 (ns2@medicine.wisc.edu).

Abstract

Patient interviews using the Health Belief Model framework identified thematic patient perceptions of indwelling urinary catheters and catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Generally, patients perceived catheters as convenient and were unaware of catheter alternatives and risks for infection. Better patient education is needed to reduce urinary catheter use and infections.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:1098–1100

Type
Concise Communications
Copyright
© 2016 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hollingsworth, JM, Rogers, MA, Krein, SL, et al. Determining the noninfectious complications of indwelling urethral catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:401410.Google Scholar
2. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Crit Care Nurse 2012;32:75.Google Scholar
3. Buckley, C, Clements, C, Hopper, A. Reducing inappropriate urinary catheter use: quality care initiatives. Br J Nurs 2015;24(S18):S20S22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Krein, SL, Kowalski, CP, Harrod, M, Forman, J, Saint, S. Barriers to reducing urinary catheter use: a qualitative assessment of a statewide initiative. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:881886.Google Scholar
5. Purvis, S, Gion, T, Kennedy, G, et al. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection: a successful prevention effort employing a multipronged initiative at an academic medical center. J Nurs Care Qual 2014;29:141148.Google Scholar
6. Safdar, N, Codispoti, N, Purvis, S, Knobloch, MJ. Patient perspectives on indwelling urinary catheter use in the hospital. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:e23e24.Google Scholar
7. Becker MH. The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Educ Monogr 1974;2:324508.Google Scholar
8. Heid, C, Knobloch, MJ, Schulz, LT, Safdar, N. Use of the Health Belief Model to study patient perceptions of antimicrobial stewardship in the acute care setting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016:17.Google Scholar
9. Bishop, AC, Baker, GR, Boyle, TA, MacKinnon, NJ. Using the Health Belief Model to explain patient involvement in patient safety. Health Expect 2015;18:30193033.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Quast supplementary material

Quast supplementary material 1

Download Quast supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 17.1 KB