Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T06:42:53.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surgical Site Infections After Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomies in Community Hospitals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Luke F. Chen*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke Infection Control Outreach Network, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Deverick J. Anderson
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke Infection Control Outreach Network, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Matthew G. Hartwig
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Keith S. Kaye
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke Infection Control Outreach Network, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Daniel J. Sexton
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke Infection Control Outreach Network, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
*
2100 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710 (luke.chen@duke.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2008

References

1.Legorreta, AP, Silber, JH, Costantino, GN, Kobylinski, RW, Zatz, SL. Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 1993;270:14291432.Google Scholar
2.Hendolin, HI, Paakonen, ME, Alhava, EM, Tarvainen, R, Kemppinen, T, Lahtinen, P. Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response. Eur J Surg 2000;166:394399.Google Scholar
3.Zacks, SL, Sandler, RS, Rutledge, R, Brown, RS Jr.A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:334340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Inoue, H, Itoh, K-i, Hori, H, et al.The cosmetic benefit of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and umbilical trocar insertion. Dig Endose 1994;6:4951.Google Scholar
5.Biscione, FM, Couto, RC, Pedrosa, TM, Neto, MC. Comparison of the risk of surgical site infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:11031106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Livingston, EH, Rege, RV. A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2004;188:205211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Richards, C, Edwards, J, Culver, D, Emori, TG, Toison, J, Gaynes, R. Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? Ann Surg 2003;237:358362.Google Scholar
8.National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:470485.Google Scholar
9.Chuang, SC, Lee, KT, Chang, WT, et al.Risk factors for wound infection after cholecystectomy. J Formos Med Assoc 2004;103:607612.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Williams, LF Jr., Chapman, WC, Bonau, RA, McGee, EC Jr., Boyd, RW, Jacobs, JK. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center. Am J Surg 1993;165:459465.Google Scholar