Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T05:13:39.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Software Program to Calculate Goodman and Kruskal's Gamma: A Method to Monitor Surgical-Site Infection Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2016

Thomas E. Wasser
Thomas E. Wasser*
Affiliation:
Health Studies Department, Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, Pennsylvania
*
Health Studies Department, Moyer House, Lehigh Valley Hospital, 227 N 17th St, Allentown, PA 18104; e-mail, Thomas.Wasser@lvh.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several studies have described a need for a valid statistical methodology to facilitate interhospital and intrahospital infection rates for their operative procedures. Physician awareness of postoperative surgical-site infection rates has been demonstrated as an effective means to reduce infection rates in both high- and low-risk surgical patients. This article presents a new software program that allows for simple data entry and provides results including the gamma statistic, sample size, variance, standard error, and Z value and P value of the gamma result. This software also provides a data interpretation table, allowing infectious disease department physicians or staff to determine if a significant relation exists between operative procedure infection rates and patient risk factors.

Type
Information Management
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 19 , Issue 11 , November 1998 , pp. 869 - 871
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure and patient risk index. Am J Med 1991;91(suppl 3B):152S–157S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Goodman, LA, Kruskal, WH. Measures of association for cross classifications. J Am Stat Assoc 1954;49:732–764.Google Scholar
3. Siegel, S, Castellan, NJ. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1988:291–298.Google Scholar
4. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide, 1 Version 6. 4th ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1990:866.Google Scholar
5. Dixon, WJ, ed. BMDP Statistical Software Manual, 1. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1988:264-266, 549–550.Google Scholar