Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:24:40.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

National validation of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services strategy for identifying potential surgical-site infections following colon surgery and abdominal hysterectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2023

Michael S. Calderwood*
Affiliation:
Section of Infectious Disease and International Health, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
Ken Kleinman
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Amherst School of Public Health and Health Sciences, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
Christina B. Bruce
Affiliation:
Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Lauren Shimelman
Affiliation:
Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Rebecca E. Kaganov
Affiliation:
Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Richard Platt
Affiliation:
Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Susan S. Huang
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA
*
Corresponding author: Michael S. Calderwood; Email: Michael.S.Calderwood@hitchcock.org

Abstract

Objective:

National validation of claims-based surveillance for surgical-site infections (SSIs) following colon surgery and abdominal hysterectomy.

Design:

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting:

US hospitals selected for data validation by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Participants:

The study included 550 hospitals performing colon surgery and 458 hospitals performing abdominal hysterectomy in federal fiscal year 2013.

Methods:

We requested 1,200 medical records from hospitals selected for validation as part of the CMS Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting program. For colon surgery, we sampled 60% with a billing code suggestive of SSI during their index admission and/or readmission within 30 days and 40% who were readmitted without one of these codes. For abdominal hysterectomy, we included all patients with an SSI code during their index admission, all patients readmitted within 30 days, and a sample of those with a prolonged surgical admission (length of stay > 7 days). We calculated sensitivity and positive predictive value for the different groups.

Results:

We identified 142 colon-surgery SSIs (46 superficial SSIs and 96 deep and organ-space SSIs) and 127 abdominal-hysterectomy SSIs (58 superficial SSIs and 69 deep and organ-space SSIs). Extrapolating to the full CMS data validation cohort, we estimated an SSI rate of 8.3% for colon surgery and 3.0% for abdominal hysterectomy. Our colon-surgery surveillance codes identified 93% of SSIs, with 1 SSI identified for every 2.6 patients reviewed. Our abdominal-hysterectomy surveillance codes identified 73% of SSIs, with 1 SSI identified for every 1.6 patients reviewed.

Conclusions:

Using claims to target record review for SSI validation performed well in a national sample.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services. Hospital inpatient prospective payment system for acute-care hospitals and long-term care hospitals: prospective payment and FY 2012 rates. Fed Register 2011;76:5147651846.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Human Services. Surgical-site infection (SSI) event procedure-associated module. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf. Accessed July 2, 2023.Google Scholar
National Healthcare Safety Network. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/index.html. Accessed July 2, 2023.Google Scholar
Care compare. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website. https://www.medicare.gov/care-compare/. Accessed July 2, 2023.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Human Services. Hospital value-based purchasing. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/HVBP/Hospital-Value-Based-Purchasing. Accessed July 2, 2023.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Human Services. Hospital-acquired condition reduction program. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/HAC-Reduction-Program.html. Accessed July 2, 2023.Google Scholar
Haley, VB, Van Antwerpen, C, Tserenpuntsag, B, et al. Use of administrative data in efficient auditing of hospital-acquired surgical-site infections, New York State 2009–2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:565571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yokoe, DS, Khan, Y, Olsen, MA, et al. Enhanced surgical-site infection surveillance following hysterectomy, vascular, and colorectal surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:768773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Letourneau, AR, Calderwood, MS, Huang, SS, Bratzler, DW, Ma, A, Yokoe, DS. Harnessing claims to improve detection of surgical-site infections following hysterectomy and colorectal surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:13211323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mannien, J, Wille, JC, Snoeren, RL, van den Hof, S. Impact of postdischarge surveillance on surgical-site infection rates for several surgical procedures: results from the nosocomial surveillance network in The Netherlands. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:809816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, J, Allardice, G, Bruce, J, Hill, R, McCoubrey, J. Procedure-specific surgical-site infection rates and postdischarge surveillance in Scotland. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:13181323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reese, SM, Knepper, BC, Price, CS, Young, HL. An evaluation of surgical-site infection surveillance methods for colon surgery and hysterectomy in Colorado hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:353355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ju, MH, Ko, CY, Hall, BL, Bosk, CL, Bilimoria, KY, Wick, EC. A comparison of 2 surgical-site infection monitoring systems. JAMA Surg 2015;150:5157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ming, DY, Chen, LF, Miller, BA, Anderson, DJ. The impact of depth of infection and postdischarge surveillance on rate of surgical-site infections in a network of community hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:276282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, SS, Placzek, H, Livingston, J, et al. Use of Medicare claims to rank hospitals by surgical-site infection risk following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:775783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calderwood, MS, Kleinman, K, Bratzler, DW, et al. Use of Medicare claims to identify US hospitals with a high rate of surgical-site infection after hip arthroplasty. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:3139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calderwood, MS. Kleinman, K, Bratzler, DW, et al. Medicare claims can be used to identify US hospitals with higher rates of surgical-site infection following vascular surgery. Med Care 2014;52:918925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calderwood, MS, Kleinman, K, Murphy, MV, Platt, R, Huang, SS. Improving public reporting and data validation for complex surgical-site infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and hip arthroplasty. Open Forum Infect Dis 2014;1:ofu106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calderwood, MS, Huang, SS, Keller, V, Bruce, CB, Kazerouni, NN, Janssen, L. Variable case detection and many unreported cases of surgical-site infection following colon surgery and abdominal hysterectomy in a statewide validation. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:10911097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health and Human Services. Operational guidance for reporting surgical-site infection (SSI) data to CDC’s NHSN for the purpose of fulfilling CMS’s Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) program requirements. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/FINAL-ACH-SSI-Guidance.pdf. Accessed July 2, 2023.Google Scholar
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services. Targeting SSI for validation. Fed Register 2012;77:5354553547.Google Scholar
Knepper, BC, Young, H, Reese, SM, Savitz, LA, Price, CS. Identifying colon and open reduction fracture surgical-site infections using a partially automated electronic algorithm. Am J Infect Control 2014;42 suppl 10:S291S295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokoe, DS, Avery, TR, Platt, R, Kleinman, K, Huang, SS. Ranking hospitals based on colon surgery and abdominal hysterectomy surgical-site infection outcomes: impact of limiting surveillance to the operative hospital. Clin Infect Dis 2018;67:10961102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Healthcare Safety Network. HAI progress reports. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/datastat/progress-report.html. Accessed July 2, 2023.Google Scholar
Bucher, BT, Yang, M, Arndorfer, J, Frame, C, Orton, J, Samore, MH, Dascomb, KK. Changes in the accuracy of administrative data for the detection of surgical-site infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021;42:11281130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Calderwood et al. supplementary material

Calderwood et al. supplementary material

Download Calderwood et al. supplementary material(File)
File 20.5 KB