Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:10:01.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multicenter Intervention Program to Increase Adherence to Hand Hygiene Recommendations and Glove Use and to Reduce the Incidence of Antimicrobial Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

William E. Trick ,
Michael O. Vernon ,
Sharon F. Welbel ,
Patricia DeMarais ,
Mary K. Hayden ,
Robert A. Weinstein  and
Chicago Antimicrobial Resistance Project
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

To determine whether a multimodal intervention could improve adherence to hand hygiene and glove use recommendations and decrease the incidence of antimicrobial resistance in different types of healthcare facilities.

Design.

Prospective, observational study performed from October 1, 1999, through December 31, 2002. We monitored adherence to hand hygiene and glove use recommendations and the incidence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria among isolates from clinical cultures. We evaluated trends in and predictors for adherence and preferential use of alcohol-based hand rubs, using multivariable analyses.

Setting.

Three intervention hospitals (a 660-bed acute and long-term care hospital, a 120-bed community hospital, and a 600-bed public teaching hospital) and a control hospital (a 700-bed university teaching hospital).

Intervention.

At the intervention hospitals, we introduced or increased the availability of alcohol-based hand rub, initiated an interactive education program, and developed a poster campaign; at the control hospital, we only increased the availability of alcohol-based hand rub.

Results.

We observed 6,948 hand hygiene opportunities. The frequency of hand hygiene performance or glove use significantly increased during the study period at the intervention hospitals but not at the control hospital; the maximum quarterly frequency of hand hygiene performance or glove use at intervention hospitals (74%, 80%, and 77%) was higher than that at the control hospital (59%). By multivariable analysis, preferential use of alcohol-based hand rubs rather than soap and water for hand hygiene was more likely among workers at intervention hospitals compared with nonintervention hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 4.6 [95% confidence interval, 3.3-6.4]) and more likely among physicians (adjusted odds ratio, 1.4 [95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.8]) than among nurses at intervention hospitals. A significantly reduced incidence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria among isolates from clinical culture was found at a single intervention hospital, which had the greatest increase in the frequency of hand hygiene performance.

Conclusions.

During a 3-year period, a multimodal intervention program increased adherence to hand hygiene recommendations, especially to the use of alcohol-based hand rubs. In one hospital, a concomitant reduction was found in the incidence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria among isolates from clinical cultures.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , January 2007 , pp. 42 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fridkin, SK, Steward, CD, Edwards, JR, et al. Surveillance of antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in United States hospitals: project ICARE phase 2. Project Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology (ICARE) hospitals. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:245–252.Google Scholar
2. Pittet, D, Hugonnet, S, Harbarth, S, et al. Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene: Infection Control Programme. Lancet 2000;356:1307–2312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. MacDonald, A, Dinah, F, MacKenzie, D, Wilson, A. Performance feedback of hand hygiene, using alcohol gel as the skin decontaminant, reduces the number of inpatients newly affected by MRSA and antibiotic costs. J Hosp Infect 2004;56:56–63.Google Scholar
4. Larson, EL, Early, E, Cloonan, P, Sugrue, S, Parides, M. An organizational climate intervention associated with increased handwashing and decreased nosocomial infections. Behav Med 2000;26:14–22.Google Scholar
5. Rosenthal, VD, Guzman, S, Safdar, N. Reduction in nosocomial infection with improved hand hygiene in intensive care units of a tertiary care hospital in Argentina. Am J Infect Control 2005;33:392–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Bischoff, WE, Reynolds, TM, Sessler, CN, Edmond, MB, Wenzel, RP. Handwashing compliance by health care workers: the impact of introducing an accessible, alcohol-based hand antiseptic. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1017–1021.Google Scholar
7. Pittet, D, Simon, A, Hugonnet, S, Pessoa-Silva, CL, Sauvan, V, Perneger, TV. Hand hygiene among physicians: performance, beliefs, and perceptions. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Pittet, D, Mourouga, P, Perneger, TV. Compliance with handwashing in a teaching hospital: Infection Control Programme. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Lankford, MG, Zembower, TR, Trick, WE, Hacek, DM, Noskin, GA, Peterson, LR. Influence of role models and hospital design on hand hygiene of healthcare workers. Emerg Infect Dis 2003;9:217–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Larson, E, Kretzer, EK. Compliance with handwashing and barrier precautions. J Hosp Infect 1995;30:S88–S106.Google Scholar
11. Boyce, JM, Pittet, D. Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:S3–S40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Voss, A, Widmer, AF. No time for handwashing!? Handwashing versus alcoholic rub: can we afford 100% compliance? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:205–208.Google Scholar
13. Trick, WE, Vernon, MO, Hayes, RA, et al. Impact of ring wearing on hand contamination and comparison of hand hygiene agents in a hospital. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:1383–1390.Google Scholar
14. Boyce, JM, Kelliher, S, Vallande, N. Skin irritation and dryness associated with two hand-hygiene regimens: soap-and-water hand washing versus hand antisepsis with an alcohol hand gel. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:442–448.Google Scholar
15. Larson, EL, Aiello, AE, Bastyr, J, et al. Assessment of two hand hygiene regimens for intensive care unit personnel. Crit Care Med 2001;29:944–951.Google Scholar
16. Girard, R, Amazian, K, Fabry, J. Better compliance and better tolerance in relation to a well-conducted introduction to rub-in hand disinfection. J Hosp Infect 2001;47:131–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Harbarth, S, Pittet, D, Grady, L, et al. Interventional study to evaluate the impact of an alcohol-based hand gel in improving hand hygiene compliance. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:489–495.Google Scholar
18. Hugonnet, S, Perneger, TV, Pittet, D. Alcohol-based handrub improves compliance with hand hygiene in intensive care units. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1037–1043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Larson, EL, Bryan, JL, Adler, LM, Blane, C. A multifaceted approach to changing handwashing behavior. Am J Infect Control 1997;25:3–10.Google Scholar
20. Pittet, D. Improving adherence to hand hygiene practice: a multidisci-plinary approach. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Lam, BC, Lee, J, Lau, YL. Hand hygiene practices in a neonatal intensive care unit: a multimodal intervention and impact on nosocomial infection. Pediatrics 2004;114:565–571.Google Scholar
22. Johnson, PDR, Martin, R, Burrell, LJ, et al. Efficacy of an alcohol/chlor-hexidine hand hygiene program in a hospital with high rates of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. Med J Aust 2005;183:509–514.Google Scholar
23. Kretzer, EK, Larson, EL. Behavioral interventions to improve infection control practices. Am } Infect Control 1998;26:245–253.Google Scholar
24. Wisniewski, MF, Kim, S, Trick, WE, Welbel, SF, Weinstein, RA. The effect of education on hand hygiene beliefs and practices: a five-year experience. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. In press.Google Scholar
25. Materials to promote hand hygiene in your healthcare facility. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/. Accessed March 2, 2006.Google Scholar
26. Wisniewski, MF, Kieszkowski, P, Zagorski, BM, Trick, WE, Sommers, M, Weinstein, RA. Development of a data warehouse for hospital infection control. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10:454–462.Google Scholar
27. Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128–140.Google Scholar
28. Schwartz, DSL, DeMarais, P, Trick, W, Weinstein, R. Beneficial effect of a training intervention based on IDSA and SHEA guidelines for antibiotic use in long term care facilities. In: Program and abstracts of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2001; San Francisco, CA. Abstract 490.Google Scholar
29. Gordin, FM, Schultz, ME, Huber, RA, Gill, LA. Reduction in nosocomial transmission of drug-resistant bacteria after introduction of an alcohol-based handrub. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:650–653.Google Scholar
30. Jernigan, JA, Clemence, MA, Stott, GA, et al. Control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a university hospital: one decade later. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16:686–696.Google Scholar
31. Ostrowsky, BE, Trick, WE, Sohn, AH, et al. Control of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus in health care facilities in a region. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1427–1433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Hayden, MK, Bonten, MJ, Blom, DW, Lyle, EA, van de Vijver, D, Weinstein, RA. Reduction in acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus after enforcement of routine environmental cleaning measures. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42:1552–1560.Google Scholar
33. Vernon, MO, Hayden, MK, Trick, WE, Hayes, RA, Blom, DW, Weinstein, RA. Chlorhexidine gluconate to cleanse patients in a medical intensive care unit: the effectiveness of source control to reduce the bioburden of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:306–312.Google Scholar
34. Austin, DJ, Bonten, MJ, Weinstein, RA, Slaughter, S, Anderson, RM. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci in intensive-care hospital settings: transmission dynamics, persistence, and the impact of infection control programs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:6908–6913.Google Scholar
35. Tenorio, AR, Badri, SM, Sahgal, NB, et al. Effectiveness of gloves in the prevention of hand carriage of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus species by health care workers after patient care. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:826–829.Google Scholar