Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:29:03.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measles Immunity in a Population of Healthcare Workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Mary E. Willy
Affiliation:
Hospital Epidemiology Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Deloris E. Koziol
Affiliation:
Hospital Epidemiology Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Thomas Fleisher
Affiliation:
Immunology Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Sylvia Koo
Affiliation:
Immunology Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Henry McFarland
Affiliation:
Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
James Schmitt
Affiliation:
Occupational Medical Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Robert Wesley
Affiliation:
Information Systems Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Eugene S. Hurwitz
Affiliation:
Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
David K. Henderson*
Affiliation:
Hospital Epidemiology Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland Office of the Director of the Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
*
Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 2C146, Bethesda, MD 20892

Abstract

Objectives:

To evaluate measles seroprev-among cohorts of new employees and to evaluate vaccine responses of susceptible adult healthcare workers.

Design:

New employees were screened for measles susceptibility as part of employee evaluations. Anti-IgG measles antibody tests were completed on 2,473 workers. Demographic, measles history, and measles vaccination information was collected using a short questionnaire. Susceptible workers were vaccinated and screened for vaccine responses following vaccination.

Results:

Ninety-three workers (4%) were seronegative, and 56 (2%) were equivocal. Individuals in the youngest cohort (born after 1956) were significantly more likely to be susceptible than those in the middle cohort (born 1951 to 1956) and those in the oldest cohort (born before 1951) (P<0.01). The middle cohort included eight (5%) of the 149 seronegative or equivocal workers. Among the members of the youngest cohort, those from the United States were more likely to be susceptible (P<0.01) than those from outside the United States.

Of the 106 vaccinated susceptible workers whose follow-up serologies were determined, 90 (85%) developed positive IgG serologies, six had equivocal results, and 10 were seronegative. Eleven of the 16 non- or hyporesponders were revaccinated and re-evaluated; nine developed low positive IgG antimeasles levels, one exhibited an equivocal response, and one failed to respond.

Conclusions:

A small but important proportion of healthcare workers are susceptible to measles. Whenever feasible, measles immunity programs for healthcare workers should include workers born before 1957. Of workers born after 1956, those from outside the United States are more likely to be immune than workers from inside the United States. Using the currently available vaccine, revaccination of initial non- or hyporesponders appears to be effective.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Centers for Disease Control. Measles prevention: recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee. MMWR 1989;38:118.Google Scholar
2.Markowitz, LE, Preblud, SR, Orenstein, WA, et al.Patterns of transmission in measles outbreaks in the United States, 1985-1986. N Engl J Med 1989;320:7581.Google Scholar
3.Atkinson, WL. Markowitz, LE. Adams, NC. Seastrom, GR. Transmission of measles in medical settings-united States, 1985-1989. Am J Med 1991;91:320S324S.Google Scholar
4.Watkins, NM, Smith, RP, St Germain, DL, MacKay, DN. Measles (rubeola) infection in a hospital setting. Am J Infect Control 1987;15:201206.Google Scholar
5.Braunstein, H, Thomas, S, Ito, R. Immunity to measles in a large population of varying age. Am J Dis Child 1990; 144:296298.Google Scholar
6.Houck, P, Scott-Johnson, G, Krebs, L. Measles immunity among community hospital employees. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:663668.Google Scholar
7.Gustafson, TL, Lievens, AW, Bruneil, PA, Moellenberg, RG, Buttery, CM, Sehulster, LM. Measles outbreak in a fully immunized secondary-school population. N Engl J Med 1987:316:771774.Google Scholar
8.Nkowane, BM, Bart, SW, Orenstein, WA, Baitier, M. Measles outbreak in a vaccinated school population: epidemiology, chains of transmission and the role of vaccine failures. Am J Public Health 1987;77:434438.Google Scholar
9.Markowitz, LE, Albrecht, P, Orenstein, WA, Lett, SM, Pugliese, TJ, Farrell, D. Persistence of measles antibody after revaccination. J Infect Dis 1992;166:205208.Google Scholar
10.Braunstein, H, Thomas, S, Ito, R, Jarman, C. Response of seronegative adults to measles immunization. Am J Dis Child 1991; 145:969.Google Scholar
11.Chen, RT, Markowitz, LE, Albrecht, P, et al.Measles antibody: reevaluation of protective titers. J Infect Dis 1990;162:10361042.Google Scholar
12.Mantel, N. Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom: extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. J Am Stat Assoc 1963;58:690700.Google Scholar
13.Centers for Disease Control. Measles-United States, 1990. MMWR 1991;40:369372.Google Scholar
14.James, JJ, Halvorson, GW, Gates, JR, 00 CT Measles-like disease and measles antibody titers in an adult population. Milit Med 1979;144:672676.Google Scholar
15.Krause, PJ, Cherry, JD, Deseda-Tous, J, et al.Epidemic measles in voung adults. Ann Intern Med 1979;90:873876.Google Scholar
16.Preblud, SR, Gross, F, Halsey, NA, Hinman, AR, Herrmann, KL, Koplan, IF! Assessment of susceptibility to measles and rubella. JAMA 1982;247:11341137.Google Scholar
17.Crawford, GE, Gremillion, DH. Epidemic measles and rubella in Air Force recruits: impact of immunization. J Infect Dis 1981;144:403410.Google Scholar
18.Chou, T, Weil, D, Arnow, PM. Prevalence of measles antibodies in hospital personnel. Infect Control 1986;7:309311.Google Scholar
19.Raad, II, Sherertz, RJ, Rains, CS, et al.The importance of nosocomial transmission of measles in the propagation of a community outbreak. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1989;10:161166.Google Scholar
20.Subbarao, EK, Amin, S, Kumar, ML. Prevaccination serologic screening for measles in health care workers. J Infect Dis 1991;163:876878.Google Scholar
21.Hilton, E, Singer, C, Kozarsky, P, Smith, MA, Lardis, MP, Borenstein, MTStatus of immunity to tetanus, measles, mumps, rubella, and polio among U.S. travelers. Ann Intern Med 1991;115:3233.Google Scholar
22.Kelley, PW, Petruccelli, BP, Stehr-Green, P, Erickson, RL, Mason, CJ. The susceptibility of young adult Americans to vaccine-preventable infections. JAMA 1991;266:27242729.Google Scholar
23.Albrecht, P. Herrmann, K, Bums, GR. Role of virus strain in conventional and enhanced measles plaque neutralization test. J Virol Methods 1981;3:251260.Google Scholar
24.Alper, CA, Kruskall, MS, Marcus-Bagley, D, et al.Genetic prediction of nonresponse to hepatitis B vaccine. N Engl J Med 1989;321:708712.Google Scholar
25.Siber, GR, Santosham, M, Reid, GR, et al.Impaired antibody response to Haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide and low IgG2 and IgG4 concentrations in Apache children. N Engl J Med 1990;323:13871392.Google Scholar
26.Deseda-Tous, J, Cherry, JD, Spencer, MJ, et al.Measles revaccination. Am J Dis Child 1978;132:287290.Google Scholar
27.Mathias, RG, Meekison, WG, Arcand, TA, Schechter, MTThe role of secondary vaccine failures in measles outbreaks. Am J Public Health 1989;79:475478.Google Scholar