Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:34:09.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Expressed Breast Milk From Home Safe? A Survey From a Neonatal Intensive-Care Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Kumar R. Pejaver ,
Mustafa A. Toonisi ,
Anil K. Garg  and
Ibrahim Al Hifzi
Kumar R. Pejaver
Affiliation:
NW Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
Mustafa A. Toonisi
Affiliation:
NW Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
Anil K. Garg
Affiliation:
NW Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
Ibrahim Al Hifzi
Affiliation:
NW Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 17 , Issue 6 , June 1996 , pp. 346 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1996

References

1.Meier, P, Wilks, S. The bacteria in expressed mother's milk. Matern Child Nurs J 1987;12(6):420–423.Google Scholar
2.Law, BJ, Urian, BA, Lertzman, J, Robson, D, Romance, L. Is ingestion of milk-associated bacteria by premature infants fed raw human milk controlled by routine bacteriological screening? J U Microbiol 1989;27(7):1560–1566.Google Scholar
3.Liebhaber, M, Lewiston, NJ, Asquith, MY, Aldo-Arrogol Sunshine, P. Alterations of lymphocytes and of antibody contents of human milk after processing. J Pediatr 1977;91:897–900.Google Scholar
4.Costa, KM. A comparison of colony counts of breast milk using two methods of breast cleansing. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1989;18(3)231–236.Google Scholar
5.Nutrition Committee, Canadian Pediatric Society. Statement on human milk banking. Can Med Assoc J 1985;132(7):750–752.Google Scholar