Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T12:59:06.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implementing diagnostic stewardship to improve diagnosis of urinary tract infections across three medical centers: A qualitative assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2023

Kimberly C. Claeys*
Affiliation:
Department of Science and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland
Lauren E. Weston
Affiliation:
Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Arbor, Michigan
Lisa Pineles
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Daniel J. Morgan
Affiliation:
VA Maryland Healthcare System, Department of Epidemiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Sarah L. Krein*
Affiliation:
Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Arbor, Michigan Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
*
Corresponding author: Kimberly Claeys, Email: kclaeys@rx.umaryland.edu. Or Sarah L. Krein Email: skrein@umich.edu
Corresponding author: Kimberly Claeys, Email: kclaeys@rx.umaryland.edu. Or Sarah L. Krein Email: skrein@umich.edu

Abstract

Background:

Urine-culture diagnostic stewardship aims to decrease misdiagnosis of urinary tract infections (UTIs); however, these interventions are not widely adopted. We examined UTI diagnosis and management practices to identify barriers to and facilitators of diagnostic stewardship implementation.

Methods:

Using a qualitative descriptive design, we conducted semistructured interviews at 3 Veterans’ Affairs medical centers. Interviews were conducted between November 2021 and May 2022 via Zoom videoconferencing using an interview guide and visual prototypes of proposed interventions. Interviewees were asked about current practices and thoughts on proposed interventions for urine-culture ordering, processing, and reporting. We used a rapid analysis matrix approach to summarize key interview findings and compare practices and perceptions across sites.

Results:

We interviewed 31 stakeholders and end users. All sites had an antimicrobial stewardship program but limited initiatives targeting appropriate diagnosis and management of UTIs. The majority of those interviewed identified the importance of diagnostic stewardship. Perceptions of specific interventions ranged widely by site. For urine-culture ordering, all 3 sites agreed that documentation of symptomology would improve culturing practices but did not want it to interrupt workflow. Representatives at 2 sites expressed interest in conditional urine-culture processing and 1 was opposed. All sites had similar mechanisms to report culture results but varied in perceptions of the proposed interventions. Feedback from end users was used to develop a general diagnostic stewardship implementation checklist.

Conclusion:

Interviewees thought diagnostic stewardship was important. Qualitative assessment involving key stakeholders in the UTI diagnostic process improved understanding of site-specific beliefs and practices to better implement interventions for urine-culture ordering, processing, and reporting.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Spivak, ES, Burk, M, Zhang, R, et al. Management of bacteriuria in Veterans’ Affairs hospitals. Clin Infect Dis 2017;65:910917.10.1093/cid/cix474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veillette, JJ, Waters, CD, Gelman, SS, et al. Antibiotic prescribing for adult bacteriuria and pyuria in community hospital emergency departments. Am J Emerg Med 2021;40:15.10.1016/j.ajem.2020.11.075CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolle, LE. Asymptomatic bacteriuria: when to screen and when to treat. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2003;17:367394.10.1016/S0891-5520(03)00008-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolle, LE. The paradigm shift to non-treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria. Pathogens 2016;5:38.10.3390/pathogens5020038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trautner, BW. Asymptomatic bacteriuria: when the treatment is worse than the disease. Nat Rev Urol 2011;9:8593.10.1038/nrurol.2011.192CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Köves, B, Cai, T, Veeratterapillay, R, et al. Benefits and harms of treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria: a systematic review and meta-analysis by the European Association of Urology Urological Infection Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol 2017;72:865868.10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, DJ, Malani, P, Diekema, DJ. Diagnostic stewardship—leveraging the laboratory to improve antimicrobial use. JAMA 2017;318:607608.10.1001/jama.2017.8531CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Advani, S, Vaughn, VM. Quality improvement interventions and implementation strategies for urine culture stewardship in the acute care setting: advances and challenges. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2021;23:16.10.1007/s11908-021-00760-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claeys, KC, Blanco, N, Morgan, DJ, Leekha, S, Sullivan, KV. Advances and challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections: the need for diagnostic stewardship. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2019;21:11.10.1007/s11908-019-0668-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morado, F, Wong, DW. Applying diagnostic stewardship to proactively optimize the management of urinary tract infections. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022;11:308.10.3390/antibiotics11030308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claeys, KC, Trautner, BW, Leekha, S, et al. Optimal urine culture diagnostic stewardship practice-results from an expert modified-Delphi procedure. Clin Infect Dis 2022;75:382389. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandelowski, M. What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health 2010;33:7784.10.1002/nur.20362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bearman, G, Morgan, DJ, K. Murthy, R, Hota, S, editors. Infection Prevention: New Perspectives and Controversies. New York: Springer International; 2022.10.1007/978-3-030-98427-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, RH, Sunstein, CR. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008: x, 293.Google Scholar
Reeder, B, Makic, MBF, Morrow, C, et al. Design and evaluation of low-fidelity visual display prototypes for multiple hospital-acquired conditions. Comput Inform Nurs 2020;38:562571.Google ScholarPubMed
Richardson, S, Mishuris, R, O’Connell, A, et al. ‘Think aloud’ and ‘near live’ usability testing of two complex clinical decision support tools. Int J Med Inform 2017;106:18.10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.06.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damschroder, LJ, Aron, DC, Keith, RE, Kirsh, SR, Alexander, JA, Lowery, JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009;4:50.10.1186/1748-5908-4-50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safaeinili, N, Brown-Johnson, C, Shaw, JG, Mahoney, M, Winget, M. CFIR simplified: pragmatic application of and adaptations to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) for evaluation of a patient-centered care transformation within a learning health system. Learn Health Systems 2020;4:e10201.10.1002/lrh2.10201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, MM, Ambagtsheer, RC, Casey, MG, Lawless, M. Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. Int J Qual Methods 2019;18:1609406919874596.10.1177/1609406919874596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Averill, JB. Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res 2002;12:855866.10.1177/104973230201200611CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gale, RC, Wu, J, Erhardt, T, et al. Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans’ Health Administration. Implement Sci 2019;14:11.10.1186/s13012-019-0853-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keith, RE, Crosson, JC, O’Malley, AS, Cromp, D, Taylor, EF. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: a rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implement Sci 2017;12:15.10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewinski, AA, Crowley, MJ, Miller, C, et al. Applied rapid qualitative analysis to develop a contextually appropriate intervention and increase the likelihood of uptake. Med Care 2021;59 suppl 3:S242S251.10.1097/MLR.0000000000001553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewinski, AA, Crowley, MJ, Miller, C, et al. Applied rapid qualitative analysis to develop a contextually appropriate intervention and increase the likelihood of uptake. Med Care 2021;59:S242S251.10.1097/MLR.0000000000001553CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egger, M, Balmer, F, Friedli-Wüthrich, H, Mühlemann, K. Reduction of urinary catheter use and prescription of antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in hospitalised patients in internal medicine: before-and-after intervention study. Swiss Med Wkly 2013;143:w13796.Google ScholarPubMed
Irfan, N, Brooks, A, Mithoowani, S, Celetti, SJ, Main, C, Mertz, D. A controlled quasi-experimental study of an educational intervention to reduce the unnecessary use of antimicrobials for asymptomatic bacteriuria. PLoS One 2015;10:e0132071.10.1371/journal.pone.0132071CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullin, KM, Kovacs, CS, Fatica, C, et al. A multifaceted approach to reduction of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the intensive care unit with an emphasis on ‘stewardship of culturing.’ Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:186188.10.1017/ice.2016.266CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trautner, BW, Grigoryan, L, Petersen, NJ, et al. Effectiveness of an antimicrobial stewardship approach for urinary catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:11201127.10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1878CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, KJ, Trautner, B, Russo, H, et al. Using clinical decision support to improve urine culture diagnostic stewardship, antimicrobial stewardship, and financial cost: a multicenter experience. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;41:564570.10.1017/ice.2020.37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirley, D, Scholtz, H, Osterby, K, Musuuza, J, Fox, B, Safdar, N. Optimizing inpatient urine culture ordering practices using the electronic medical record: a pilot study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:486488.10.1017/ice.2016.301CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, SC, Feldman, L, Smith, J, Pahwa, A, Cosgrove, SE, Chida, N. The use of clinical decision support in reducing diagnosis of and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria. J Hosp Med 2018;13:392395.10.12788/jhm.2892CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, G, Knowlson, S, Nguyen, H, et al. Urine test stewardship for catheterized patients in the critical care setting: provider perceptions and impact of electronic order set interventions. Am J Infect Control 2019;47:12771279.10.1016/j.ajic.2019.04.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claeys, KC, Zhan, M, Pineles, L, et al. Conditional reflex to urine culture: evaluation of a diagnostic stewardship intervention within the Veterans’ Affairs and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention practice-based research network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021;42:176181.10.1017/ice.2020.400CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stagg, A, Lutz, H, Kirpalaney, S, et al. Impact of two-step urine culture ordering in the emergency department: a time-series analysis. BMJ Qual Saf 2018;27:140147.10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006250CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, L, Edwards, JR, Halpin, AL, et al. Evaluation of a novel intervention to reduce unnecessary urine cultures in intensive care units at a tertiary-care hospital in Maryland, 2011–2014. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:606609.10.1017/ice.2016.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambliss, AB, Van, TT. Revisiting approaches to and considerations for urinalysis and urine culture reflexive testing. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2022;59:112124.10.1080/10408363.2021.1988048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard-Anderson, JR, Ashraf, S, Overton, EC, Reif, L, Murphy, DJ, Jacob, JT. Sustained decrease in urine culture utilization after implementing a reflex urine culture intervention: a multicenter quasi-experimental study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;41:369371.10.1017/ice.2020.5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vissichelli, NC, Orndahl, CM, Cecil, JA, et al. Impact of cascade reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility on fluoroquinolone and meropenem consumption at a Veterans’ Affairs medical center. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022;43:199204.10.1017/ice.2021.83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, S, Rhodes, J, Jandarov, R, DeVore, Z, Sopirala, MM. Out of sight out of mind: impact of cascade reporting on antimicrobial usage. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020;7:ofaa002.10.1093/ofid/ofaa002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100. CLSI website. https://clsi.org/standards/products/free-resources/access-our-free-resources/. Accessed April 7, 2019.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, MA, Suda, KJ, Ramanathan, S, et al. Laboratory practices for identification and reporting of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Department of Veterans’ Affairs facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:463466.10.1017/ice.2019.24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Claeys et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Claeys et al. supplementary material(File)
File 37.5 KB