Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T15:26:59.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implementation of multidrug-resistant bacterial testing to prioritize duodenoscope sterilization: Experience from a high-volume health system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2023

Jad AbiMansour
Affiliation:
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
John A. Martin
Affiliation:
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Bret T. Petersen*
Affiliation:
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
*
Corresponding author: Bret T. Petersen; Email: Petersen.bret@mayo.edu

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Brief
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Yachimski, PS, Ross, A. The future of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 2017;153:338344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heuvelmans, M, Wunderink, HF, van der Mei, HC, Monkelbaan, JF. A narrative review on current duodenoscope reprocessing techniques and novel developments. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2021;10:171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FDA safety communication. Use duodenoscopes with innovative designs to enhance safety. US Food and Drug Administration website. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/use-duodenoscopes-innovative-designs-enhance-safety-fda-safety-communication. Published online June 29, 2022. Accessed October 30, 2023.Google Scholar
Day, LW, Muthusamy, VR, Collins, J, et al. Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible GI endoscopes and accessories. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2021;93:1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, GM, Wright, SB, Smithey, A, et al. Randomized comparison of 3 high-level disinfection and sterilization procedures for duodenoscopes. Gastroenterology 2017;153:10181025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pannala, R, Baldwin, B, Aluru, V, et al. Prospective study of the feasibility of point-of-care testing strategy for carbapenem-resistant organism detection. Endosc Int Open 2018;06:E58E63.Google Scholar
Smith, ZL, Dua, A, Saeian, K, et al. A novel protocol obviates endoscope sampling for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: experience of a center with a prior outbreak. Dig Dis Sci 2017;62:31003109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Almario, CV, May, FP, Shaheen, NJ, et al. Cost utility of competing strategies to prevent endoscopic transmission of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:16661674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, GK, Pegues, DA, Kochman, ML, et al. Implementation of a systematic culturing program to monitor the efficacy of endoscope reprocessing: outcomes and costs. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018;87:104109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridtitid, W, Pakvisal, P, Chatsuwan, T, et al. A newly designed duodenoscope with detachable distal cap significantly reduces organic residue contamination after reprocessing. Endoscopy 2020;52:754760.Google ScholarPubMed
Trindade, AJ, Copland, A, Bhatt, A, et al. Single-use duodenoscopes and duodenoscopes with disposable end caps. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2021;93:9971005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed