Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:30:03.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hospital Infection Surveillance in the United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2022

G.A.J. Ayliffe
G.A.J. Ayliffe*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical School, and Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham, England
*
Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham, B18 7QH, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Surveillance methods vary in different hospitals, but are mainly based on laboratory reports, as in Sweden. These reports are supplemented by ward visits by the infection control nurse and by the usual epidemiologic methods in the investigation of outbreaks.

An increasing interest in surveillance of hospital infection occurred in the 1950s when outbreaks of staphylococcal infection were causing problems throughout the world. The appointment of an MD as infection control officer in every hospital was suggested in 1955 by Colebrook in the Birmingham Accident Hospital, but no full-time officer has so far been appointed in the United Kingdom (UK). The task was taken on by medical microbiologists, who are usually physicians and, currently in England and Wales, make up 82% of infection control officers.”

In the early days, the recording of the incidence of infection was usually confined to surgical wounds, as in the US. The problem of collecting a large amount of data by the microbiologist was recognized by Moore who appointed the first infection control nurse.” He also described the importance of laboratory reports in the early detection of outbreaks.

Surveillance was a major topic for discussion at the international Conference on Nosocomial Infections in 1970, and Moore suggested that incidence rates were of little value for determining changes in a hospital or for comparisons between hospitals. The number of infections in individual hospitals was too small for statistical comparison, particularly if rates were low and infections influenced bv many factors were not corrected for in the overall rates.

Type
Special Sections
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 9 , Issue 7 , July 1988 , pp. 320 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lowbury, EJL, Ayliffc, GAJ, Geddes, AM, et al: Control of Hospital Infection: A Practical Handbook. London, Chapman & Hall, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Casewell, MW: Surveillance of infection in hospitals. J Hosp Inject 1980;1:293–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Nyström, B: Hospital infection control in Sweden. Infect Control 1987; X:397–1.38.Google Scholar
4. Colebrook, L: Infection acquired in hospital. Lancet 1955;2:885–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Howard, AJ: Infection control organization in England and Wales 1986. J Hosp Infect 1988; 11(suppl):183–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Clarke, SKR: Sepsis in surgical wounds with particular reference to Staphylococcus aureus . Br J Surg 1957;44:592–596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Public Health Laboratory Service: Incidence of surgical wound infections in England and Wales. Lancet 1960;2:659–663.Google Scholar
8. National Research Council: Post-operative wound infections: The influence of ultra-violet irradiation of the operating room and of various other factors. Ann Surg 1964; 160(suppl 2).Google Scholar
9. Gardner, AMN, Stamp, M, Bowgeri, JA, et al: The infection control sister, a new member of the control of infection team. Lancet 1962: 2:710–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Moore, B: Surveillance of hospital infection, in Brachman, PS, Eikhoff, TC (eds): Proceedings of the International Conference on Nosocomial Infections. Chicago, American Hospital Association, 1971, pp 272–276.Google Scholar
11. Ayliffe, CAJ, Collins, BJ, Lowbury, EJL: Cleaning and disinfection of hospital floors. Br Med J 1966;2:442–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Ayliffe, GAJ, Collins, BJ, Lowbury, EJL: Ward floors and other surfaces as reservoirs of hospital infection. J Hyg (Lond) 1967;65:515–536.Google ScholarPubMed
13. Garner, JS, Bennett, JV, Scheckler, WE, et al: Surveillance of nosocomial infections, in Brachman, PS, Eikhoff, TC (eds): Proceedings of the International Conference on Nosocomial Infections. Chicago, American Hospital Association, 1971, pp 277–281.Google Scholar
14. Ayliffe, GAJ: Cross-sectional surveys of infection, in Brachman, PS, Eikhoff, TC (eds): Proceedings of the International Conference on Nosocomial Infections. Chicago, American Hospital Association, 1971, pp 282–284.Google Scholar
15. Ayliffe, GAJ: Nosocomial infection: The irreducible minimum. Infect Control 1986; 7(suppl):92–95.Google ScholarPubMed
16. Meers, PD, Ayliffe, GAJ, Emmerson, AM, et al: Report on the survey of infection in hospitals in 1980. J Hosp Infect 1981; 2(suppl).Google Scholar
17. Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White, JW, et al: The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:182–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Bibby, BA, Collins, BJ, Ayliffe, GAJ: A mathematical model for assessing risk of postoperative wound infections. J Hosp Infect 1986;8:31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar