Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:11:19.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epidemiology and risk factors for recurrent Staphylococcus aureus colonization following active surveillance and decolonization in the NICU

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2018

Ibukunoluwa C. Akinboyo*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins UniversitySchool of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Annie Voskertchian
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins UniversitySchool of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Gezahegn Gorfu
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, College of Nursing and Allied Health Sciences, Howard University, Washington, DC
Joshua F. Betz
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
Tracy L. Ross
Affiliation:
Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
Karen C. Carroll
Affiliation:
Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
Aaron M. Milstone
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins UniversitySchool of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
*
Author for correspondence: Ibukunoluwa C. Akinboyo, 200 North Wolfe Street, Room 3150, Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail: ibukun.a@duke.edu

Abstract

Objectives

To examine neonatal risk factors associated with recurrent Staphylococcus aureus colonization and to determine the genetic relatedness of S. aureus strains cultured from neonates before and after decolonization.

Study design

Single-center retrospective cohort study of neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from April 2013 to December 2015, during which weekly nasal cultures from hospitalized NICU patients were routinely obtained for S. aureus surveillance.

Setting

Johns Hopkins Hospital’s 45-bed level IV NICU in Baltimore, Maryland.

Methods

Demographics and clinical data were collected on all neonates admitted to the NICU with S. aureus nasal colonization who underwent mupirocin-based decolonization during the study period. A decolonized neonate was defined as a neonate with ≥1 negative culture after intranasal mupirocin treatment. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used for strain typing.

Results

Of 2,060 infants screened for S. aureus, 271 (13%) were colonized, and 203 of these 271 (75%) received intranasal mupirocin. Of those treated, 162 (80%) had follow-up surveillance cultures, and 63 of these 162 infants (39%) developed recurrent colonization after treatment. The S. aureus strains were often genetically similar before and after decolonization. The presence of an endotracheal tube or nasal cannula/mask was associated with an increased risk of recurrent S. aureus colonization (hazard ratio [HR], 2.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19–5.90; and HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.02–4.75, respectively).

Conclusion

Strains identified before and after decolonization were often genetically similar, and the presence of invasive respiratory devices increased the risk of recurrent S. aureus nasal colonization in neonates. To improve decolonization efficacy, alternative strategies may be needed.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lake, JG, Weiner, LM, Milstone, AM, Saiman, L, Magill, SS, See, I. Pathogen distribution and antimicrobial resistance among pediatric healthcare-associated infections reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2011–2014. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018; 39:111.Google Scholar
2. Blanchard, AC, Quach, C, Autmizguine, J. Staphylococcal infections in infants: updates and current challenges. Clin Perinatol 2015; 42:119132.Google Scholar
3. Camacho-Gonzalez, A, Spearman, PW, Stoll, BJ. Neonatal infectious diseases. evaluation of neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Clin North Am 2013;60:367389.Google Scholar
4. Stoll, BJ, Hansen, NI, Adams-Chapman, I, et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection. J Am Med Assoc 2004;292:23572365.Google Scholar
5. Shaw, AG, Sim, K, Randell, P, et al. Late-onset bloodstream infection and perturbed maturation of the gastrointestinal microbiota in premature infants. PLoS One 2015;10:e0132923.Google Scholar
6. Huang, Y-C, Chou, Y-H, Su, L-H, Lien, R-I, Lin, T-Y. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and its association with infection among infants hospitalized in neonatal intensive care units. Pediatrics 2006;118:469474.Google Scholar
7. Milstone, AM, Goldner, BW, Ross, T, Shepard, JW, Carroll, KC, Perl, TM. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and risk of subsequent infection in critically ill children: importance of preventing nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:853859.Google Scholar
8. Graham, PL III, Morel, A-S, Zhou, J, et al. Epidemiology of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in the neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:677682.Google Scholar
9. Shane, AL, Hansen, NI, Stoll, BJ, et al. Methicillin-resistant and susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and meningitis in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2012;129:e914e922.Google Scholar
10. Popoola, VO, Milstone, AM. Decolonization to prevent Staphylococcus aureus transmission and infections in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2014;34:805810.Google Scholar
11. Popoola, VO, Colantuoni, E, Suwantarat, N, et al. Active surveillance cultures and decolonization to reduce Staphylococcus aureus infections in the neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:381387.Google Scholar
12. Delaney, HM, Wang, E, Melish, M. Comprehensive strategy including prophylactic mupirocin to reduce Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in high-risk neonates. J Perinatol 2013;33:313318.Google Scholar
13. Pierce, R, Lessler, J, Popoola, VO, Milstone, AM. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) acquisition risk in an endemic neonatal intensive care unit with an active surveillance culture and decolonization programme. J Hosp Infect 2017;95:9197.Google Scholar
14. Wisgrill, L, Zizka, J, Unterasinger, L, et al. Active surveillance cultures and targeted decolonization are associated with reduced methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections in VLBW infants. Neonatology 2017;112:267273.Google Scholar
15. Septimus, EJ, Schweizer, L. Decolonization in prevention of health care-associated infections. Clin Microbiol 2016;29:201222.Google Scholar
16. Abad, CL, Pulia, MS, Safdar, N. Does the nose know? An update on MRSA decolonization strategies. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2013;15:455464.Google Scholar
17. Popoola, VO, Budd, A, Wittig, SM, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission and infections in a neonatal intensive care unit despite active surveillance cultures and decolonization: challenges for infection prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:412418.Google Scholar
18. Lepainteur, M, Royer, G, Bourrel, AS, et al. Prevalence of resistance to antiseptics and mupirocin among invasive coagulase-negative staphylococci from very preterm neonates in NICU: the creeping threat? J Hosp Infect 2013;83:333336.Google Scholar
19. Günther, F, Blessing, B, Tacconelli, E, Mutters, NT. MRSA decolonization failure—are biofilms the missing link? Antimicrob Resist Infect Contro. 2017;6:32.Google Scholar
20. Harris, PA, Taylor, R, Thielke, R, Payne, J, Gonzalez, N, Conde, JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377381.Google Scholar
21. Totten, M, Ross, T, Voskertchian, A, Colantuoni, E, Milstone, AM, Carroll, KC. Analysis of morphologically similar Staphylococcus aureus colonies for assessment of phenotypic and genotypic correlation. J Clin Microbiol 2017;55:22852286.Google Scholar
22. Tenover, FC, Arbeit, RD, Goering, RV, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. Guest commentary interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: Crite. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:22332239.Google Scholar
23. Tenover, FC, McAllister, S, Fosheim, G, et al. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from nasal cultures collected from individuals in the United States in 2001 to 2004. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46: 28372841.Google Scholar
24. Friedman, J, Hastie, T, Tibshirani, R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw 2010;33:122.Google Scholar
25. Zingg, W, Hopkins, S, Gayet-Ageron, A, et al. Health-care–associated infections in neonates, children, and adolescents: an analysis of paediatric data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control point-prevalence survey. Lancet Infect Dis 2017;17:381389.Google Scholar
26. Achermann, Y, Seidl, K, Kuster, SP, et al. Epidemiology of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatology ward. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:13051312.Google Scholar
27. Washam, M, Woltmann, J, Haberman, B, Haslam, D, Staat, MA. Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in the neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control 2017;45:13881393.Google Scholar
28. Maraqa, NF, Aigbivbalu, L, Masnita-Iusan, C, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection among infants at a level III neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control 2011;39:3541.Google Scholar
29. Milstone, AM, Koontz, DW, Voskertchian, A, et al. Treating parents to reduce NICU transmission of Staphylococcus aureus (TREAT PARENTS) trial: protocol of a multisite randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMJ Open 2015;5:e0092742015-009274.Google Scholar
30. Zur, KB, Mandell, DL, Gordon, RE, Holzman, I, Rothschild, MA. Electron microscopic analysis of biofilm on endotracheal tubes removed from intubated neonates. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:407421.Google Scholar
31. Gregory, ML, Eichenwald, EC, Puopolo, KM. Seven-year experience with a surveillance program to reduce methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2009;123:e790e796.Google Scholar
32. von Eiff, C, Becker, K, Machka, K, Stammer, H, Peters, G. Nasal carriage as a source of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Study Group. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1116.Google Scholar
33. Nelson, MU, Bizzarro, MJ, Dembry, LM, Baltimore, RS, Gallagher, PG. One size does not fit all: why universal decolonization strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in adult intensive care units may be inappropriate for neonatal intensive care units. J Perinatol. 2014;34:653655.Google Scholar
34. Huang, SS, Septimus, E, Kleinman, K, et al. Targeted versus universal decolonization to prevent ICU infection. N Engl J Med 2013;368:22552265.Google Scholar
35. Jernigan, J, Titus, M, Gröschel, D, Getchell-White, S, Farr, B. Effectiveness of contact isolation during a hospital outbreak of methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Am J Epidemiol 1996;143:496504.Google Scholar
36. Schweizer, ML, Chiang, H-Y, Septimus, E, et al. Association of a bundled intervention with surgical site infections among patients undergoing cardiac, hip, or knee surgery. JAMA 2015;313:2162.Google Scholar
37. Moore, G, Cookson, B, Gordon, NC, et al. Whole-genome sequencing in hierarchy with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: the utility of this approach to establish possible sources of MRSA cross-transmission. J Hosp Infect 2015;90:3845. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.12.014 Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Akinboyo et al. supplementary material

Akinboyo et al. supplementary material 1

Download Akinboyo et al. supplementary material(File)
File 12.2 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Akinboyo et al. supplementary material

Akinboyo et al. supplementary material 2

Download Akinboyo et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 48 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Akinboyo et al. supplementary material

Akinboyo et al. supplementary material 3

Download Akinboyo et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 72.5 KB