Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T05:07:48.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effectiveness of an Antimicrobial Polymer to Decrease Contamination of Environmental Surfaces in the Clinical Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2016

Kerri A. Thom ,
Harold C. Standiford ,
J. Kristie Johnson ,
Nader Hanna  and
Jon P. Furuno
Kerri A. Thom*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Harold C. Standiford
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
J. Kristie Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Nader Hanna
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Jon P. Furuno
Affiliation:
Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University College of Pharmacy, Portland, Oregon
*
685 West Baltimore Street, MSTF Suite 334B, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 (kthom@epi.umaryland.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We performed a real-world, controlled intervention to investigate use of an antimicrobial surface polymer, MSDS Poly, on environmental contamination. Pathogenic bacteria were identified in 18 (90%) of 20 observations in treated rooms and 19 (83%) of 23 observations in untreated rooms (P = .67). MSDS Poly had no significant effect on environmental contamination.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35(8):1060–1062

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 35 , Issue 8 , August 2014 , pp. 1060 - 1062
Copyright
© 2014 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Carling, PC, Bartley, JM. Evaluating hygienic cleaning in health care settings: what you do not know can harm your patients. Am J Infect Control 2010;38(5 suppl 1):S41–S50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Huang, SS, Datta, R, Platt, R. Risk of acquiring antibiotic-resistant bacteria from prior room occupants. Arch Intern Med 2006;166(18):1945–1951.Google Scholar
3. Siddiqui, WH, Malek, JR, Stanton, E, Hobbs, EJ. Percutaneous absorption of an antimicrobial organosilicon quarternary ammonium chloride in rabbits. J Appl Toxicol 1983;3(3):146–149.Google Scholar
4. Siddiqui, WH, York, RG. Quaternary silsesquioxane: a developmental toxicity study in rats. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1993;21(1):66–70.Google Scholar
5. Varghese, S, Elfakhri, S, Sheel, DW, Sheel, P, Bolton, FJ, Foster, HA. Novel antibacterial silver-silica surface coatings prepared by chemical vapour deposition for infection control. J Appl Microbiol 2013;115(5):1107–1116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. D’Antonio, NN, Rihs, JD, Stout, JE, Yu, VL. Computer keyboard covers impregnated with a novel antimicrobial polymer significantly reduce microbial contamination. Am J Infect Control 2013;41(4):337–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Wilson, M. Light-activated antimicrobial coating for the continuous disinfection of surfaces. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24(10):782–784.Google Scholar
8. Ismail, S, Perni, S, Pratten, J, Parkin, I, Wilson, M. Efficacy of a novel light-activated antimicrobial coating for disinfecting hospital surfaces. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32(11):1130–1132.Google Scholar
9. Decraene, V, Pratten, J, Wilson, M. An assessment of the activity of a novel light-activated antimicrobial coating in a clinical environment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29(12):1181–1184.Google Scholar