Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T20:20:03.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Long-term Storage on Sterile Status of Devices in Surgical Packs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

N. Ariene Klapes ,
Velvl W. Greene ,
Ann C. Langholz  and
Cindy Hunstiger
N. Ariene Klapes*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Saint Marys Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota
Velvl W. Greene
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Saint Marys Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota
Ann C. Langholz
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Saint Marys Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota
Cindy Hunstiger
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Saint Marys Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota
*
Univetsity of Minnesota, Division of Environmental and Occupational Health, Mayo Box 197, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated the effect of the following on the sterile integrity of surgical packs: four wrapping materials (two-ply reusable, nonbarrier wovens, both new and previously used; disposable, barrier nonwovens; and polypropylene peel pouches), dustcovers, two storage locations, and storage times ranging from 2 to 50 weeks. Two hundred sixty-three packs containing stainless steel coupons were prepared, wrapped, sterilized, and stored. Half of the packs were dustcovered prior to storage. At monthly intervals for a year, packs of each type were opened in a laminar flow hood, and the coupons inoculated into trypticase soy broth. The coupon contamination probabilities were 0.019 for reusable, woven packs; 0.017 for disposable, nonwoven packs; and 0.016 for peel pouches. These differences were not significant. The probability of finding a contaminated coupon in any pack after 50 weeks was 0.018. No trend toward increased probability of contamination over time was observed for any of the pack types studied.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 8 , Issue 7 , July 1987 , pp. 289 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.AMH/181-Accreditation Manual for Hospitots. Chicago, Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Hospitals, 1986, p 324.Google Scholar
2.Simmons, BP, CDC guidelines for the prevention and control of nosocomial infections: Guidelines for hospital environmental control. Am J Infect Control 1983;11:97–120.Google Scholar
3.CDC Guideline for Handwashing and Hospital Environmental Control. Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control, 1985.Google Scholar
4.Standard, PG, Mackel, DC, Mallison, GF, Microbial penetration of muslin- and paper-wrapped sterile packs stored on open shelves and in closed cabinets. Appl Microbiol 1971;22:432–437.Google Scholar
5.Standard, PG, Mallison, GF, Mackel, DC, Microbial penetration through three types of double wrappers for sterile packs. Appi Microbiol 1973;26:59–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Mallison, GF, Standard, PG, Safe storage times for sterile packs. Hospitals 1974;48:77–79.Google Scholar
7.Favero, MS, McDade, JJ, Robertsen, JA, et al: Microbiological sampling of surfaces. J Appi Bacterial 1968;31:336–343.Google Scholar
8.Mayworm, D, Sterile shelf life and expiration dating. J Hosp Supply, Processing and Distribution 1984;2:32–35.Google Scholar
9.Litsky, BY, Litsky, W, Standards for packaging needed for improved safety. AORNJ 1976;23:27–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Cooper, MS, The evolving USP sterility test, J Parenler Sci Technol 1982;36:256–259.Google Scholar
11.Schneider, PM, Microbiological evaluation of packaging and packaging-material integrity. Med Device and Diagn Industry 1980;2:29–37.Google Scholar
12.Association of Operating Room Nurses: AORN recommended practices for in hospital packaging materials. AORN J 1983;37:255–258.Google Scholar
13.Belkin, NL, Central service guidelines present challenges for in-house packaging. Hospitals 1978;52:146–148.Google ScholarPubMed