Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T16:52:22.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Chlorhexidine Probably Overestimated Because of Lack of Neutralization after Sampling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Günter Kampf*
Affiliation:
Scientific Affairs, Bode Chemie, Hamburg, and the Institut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
*
Scientific Affairs, Bode Chemie, Melanchthonstrasse 27, 22525 Hamburg, Germany (guenter.kampf@bode-chemie.de)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2009

References

1.Veiga, DF, Damasceno, CA, Veiga-Filho, J, et al.Randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of Chlorhexidine showers before elective plastic surgical procedures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:7779.Google Scholar
2.Kampf, G, Shaffer, M, Hunte, C. Insufficient neutralization in testing a chlorhexidine-containing ethanol-based hand rub can result in a false positive efficacy assessment. BMC Infect Dis 2005;5:48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Kampf, G. What is left to justify the use of Chlorhexidine in hand hygiene? J Hosp Infect 2008;70(suppl l):2734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Reichel, M, Heisig, P, Kampf, G. Pitfalls in efficacy testing—how important is the validation of neutralization of Chlorhexidine digluconate? Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2008;7:20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Chaiyakunapruk, N, Veenstra, DL, Lipsky, BA, Saint, S. Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:792801.Google Scholar
6.Kampf, G, Kramer, A. Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs. Clin Microbiol Rev 2004;17:863893.Google Scholar