Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:18:31.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diarrheal Disease in the Hospitalized Patient

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Peter H. Gilligan*
Affiliation:
Clinical Microbiology-Immunology Laboratories, North Carolina Memorial Hospitaland Departments of Microbiology & Immunology and Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina
*
Department of Microbiology & Immunology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514

Extract

In the past 15 years, our knowledge of the pathogenesis and etiologic agents of diarrheal disease has expanded rapidly. No longer is it scientifically appropriate or cost effective for the laboratory simply to culture a stool for Salmonella and Shigella and to do a wet mount for amebae. Today we have a plethora of agents including, but not limited to, Campylobacter, Yersinia, Clostridium difficile, Escherichia coli, Aeromonas, Plesiomonas, vibrios, rotavirus, Norwalk agent, Giardia, and Cryptosporidium, which have all been suggested to be agents of diarrheal disease. Given such a wide range of possibilities, what approaches should be taken to determine the etiologic agent of diarrheal disease in the hospitalized patient in an era of cost containment?

Type
Special Sections
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gilligan, PH, McCarthy, LR, Genta, V: Relative frequency of Clostridium difficile in patients with diarrheal disease. J Clin Microbiol 1981; 14:2631.Google Scholar
2. Kapikian, AZ, Kim, HW, Wyatt, RG, et al: Human reovirus-like agent as the major pathogen associated with winter gastroenteritis in hospitalized infants and young children. N Engl J Med 1976; 294:965972.Google Scholar
3. Middleton, PJ, Szymanski, MT, Petric, M: Viruses associated with acute gastroenteritis in young children. Am J Dis Child 1977; 131:733737.Google Scholar
4. Silva, J, Fekety, R, Werk, C, et al: Inciting and etiologic agents of colitis. Rev Infect Dit 1984; 6(Suppl 1):52145221.Google Scholar
5. Stark, PL, Lee, A: Clostridia isolated from the feces of infants during the first year of life. J Pediatr 1982; 100:362365.Google Scholar
6. Burday, MS, Williams, K, Calcagno, JV, et al: Twenty-month multiple hospital survey of factors relating to Clostridium difficile positivity. 83rd American Society for Microbiology Meeting, Abstract C203, 1983, New Orleans, LA. Google Scholar
7. Taylor, NS, Thome, GM, Bartlett, J: Comparison of two toxins produced by Clostridium difficile . Infect Immun 1981; 35:10321040.Google Scholar
8. Chang, TW, Lauermann, M, Bartlett, J: Cytotoxicity assay in antibiotic-associated colitis. J Infect Dis 1979; 140:765770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Laughon, BE, Viscidi, RP, Gdovin, SL, et al: Enzyme immunoassay for detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in fecal spectrums. J Infect Dis 1984; 149:781788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kurzynski, JA, Cembrowski, GS, Kimball, J: Use of CIE for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxin in stool filtrates: Laboratory and clinical correlation. Am J Clin Pathol 1983; 79:370374.Google Scholar
11. Shahrabadi, MS, Bryan, LE, Gaffney, D, et al: Latex agglutination test for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin in stool samples. J Clin Microbiol 1984; 20:339341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Lylerly, DA, Wilkins, T: Commercial latex test for Clostridium difficile toxin A does not detect toxin A. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 23:622623.Google Scholar
13. Viscidi, RP, Willey, S, Bartlett, J: Isolation rates and toxigenic potential of Clostridium difficile isolates from various patient populations. Gastroenterology 1981; 81:59.Google Scholar
14. Walters, BAJ, Roberts, R, Stafford, R, et al: Relapse of antibiotic associated colitis: Endogenous persistence of Clostridium difficile during vancomycin therapy. Gut 1983; 24:206212.Google Scholar
15. Malamou-Ladas, H, O'Farrell, S, Nash, JQ, et al: Isolation of Clostridium difficile from patients and the environment of hospital wards. J Clin Pathol 1983; 36:8892.Google Scholar
16. Kim, KH, Fekety, R, Batts, DH, et al: Isolation of Clostridium difficile from the environment and contacts of patient with antibiotic-associated colitis. J Infect Dis 1981; 143:4250.Google Scholar
17. WHO Scientific Working Group: Rotavirus and other viral diarrhoeas. Bull WHO 1980; 58:183198.Google Scholar
18. Gurwith, M, Wenman, W, Hinde, D, et al: A prospective study of rotavirus infection in infants and young children. J Infect Dis 1981; 144:218224.Google Scholar
19. Koopman, JS, Turkish, VJ, Monto, AS, et al: Patterns and etiology of diarrhea in three clinical settings. Am J Epidemiol 1984; 119:114123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Santosham, M, Yolken, RH, Wyatt, RG, et al: Epidemiology of rotavirus diarrhea in a prospectively monitored American Indian population. J Infect Dis 1985; 152:778783.Google Scholar
21. Pai, CH, Shahrabodi, MS, Ince, B: Rapid diagnosis of rotavirus gastroenteritis by commercial latex agglutination test. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 22:846850.Google Scholar
22. Miotti, PO, Eiden, J, Yolken, R: Comparative efficiency of commercial immunoassays for diagnosis of rotavirus gastroenteritis during the course of infection. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 22:693698.Google Scholar
23. Riley, LW, Remis, RS, Helgerson, SD, et al: Hemorrhagic colitis associated with a rare Escherichia coli serotype. N Engl J Med 1983; 308:681685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Glaser, JB, Morton-Kute L, Berger, et al: Recurrent Salmonella typhimurium bacteremia associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102:189193.Google Scholar
25. Ma, P, Soave, R: Three step examination for cryptosporidiosis in 10 homosexual men with protracted watery diarrhea. J Infect Dis 1983; 146:763769.Google Scholar