Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:25:24.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Detection of Mixed Populations of Clostridium difficile from Symptomatic Patients Using Capillary-Based Polymerase Chain Reaction Ribotyping

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Adam A. Behroozian ,
Jeffrey P. Chludzinski ,
Eugene S. Lo ,
Sarah A. Ewing ,
Sheila Waslawski ,
Duane W. Newton ,
Vincent B. Young ,
David M. Aronoff  and
Seth T. Walk
Adam A. Behroozian
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Jeffrey P. Chludzinski
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Eugene S. Lo
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Sarah A. Ewing
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Sheila Waslawski
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Duane W. Newton
Affiliation:
Clinical Microbiology Laboratories, Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Vincent B. Young
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
David M. Aronoff
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Seth T. Walk*
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan Department of Microbiology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana
*
Montana State University, 109 Lewis Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717 (seth.walk@montana.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

To investigate the simultaneous occurrence of more than 1 Clostridium difficile ribotype in patients' stool samples at the time of diagnostic testing.

Methods.

Stool samples submitted for diagnostic testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile were obtained for 102 unique patients. A total of 95 single colonies of C. difficile per stool sample were isolated on selective media, subcultured alongside negative (uninoculated) controls, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotyped using capillary gel electrophoresis.

Results.

Capillary-based PCR ribotyping was successful for 9,335 C. difficile isolates, yielding a median of 93 characterized isolates per stool sample (range, 69-95). More than 1 C. difficile ribotype was present in 16 of 102 (16%) C. difficile infection (CDI) cases; 2 of the 16 mixtures were composed of at least 3 ribotypes, while the remaining 14 were composed of at least 2.

Conclusions.

Deep sampling of patient stool samples coupled with capillary-based PCR ribotyping identified a high rate of mixed CDI cases compared with previous estimates. Studies seeking to quantify the clinical significance of particular C. difficile ribotypes should account for mixed cases of disease.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 34 , Issue 9 , September 2013 , pp. 961 - 966
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Kuijper, EJ, Oudbier, JH, Stuifbergen, WN, Jansz, A, Zanen, HC. Application of whole-cell DNA restriction endonuclease profiles to the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-induced diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 1987;25(4):751–753.Google Scholar
2.Bidet, P, Barbut, F, Lalande, V, Burghoffer, B, Petit, JC. Development of a new PCR-ribotyping method for Clostridium difficile based on ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999;175(2):261–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Marsh, JW, O';Leary, MM, Shutt, KA, et al.Multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis for investigation of Clostridium difficile transmission in hospitals. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44(7):2558–2566.Google Scholar
4.Eyre, DW, Walker, AS, Griffiths, D, et al.Clostridium difficile mixed infection and reinfection. J Clin Microbiol 2012;50(1):142–144.Google Scholar
5.Hell, M, Permoser, M, Chmelizek, G, et al.Clostridium difficile infection: monoclonal or polyclonal genesis? Infection 2011; 39(5):461–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.van den Berg, RJ, Ameen, HA, Furusawa, T, Claas, EC, van der Vorm, ER, Kuijper, EJ. Coexistence of multiple PCR-ribotype strains of Clostridium difficile in faecal samples limits epidemiological studies. J Med Microbiol 2005;54(2):173–179.Google Scholar
7.Wróblewski, D, Hannett, GE, Bopp, DJ, et al.Rapid molecular characterization of Clostridium difficile and assessment of populations of C. difficile in stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47(7):2142–2148.Google Scholar
8.Indra, A, Huhulescu, S, Schneeweis, M, et al.Characterization of Clostridium difficile isolates using capillary gel electrophoresis-based PCR ribotyping. J Med Microbiol 2008;57(11):1377–1382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Walk, ST, Micie, D, Jain, R, et al.Clostridium difficile ribotype does not predict severe infection. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55(12):1661–1668.Google Scholar
10.McDonald, LC, Coignard, B, Dubberke, E, Song, X, Horan, T, Kutty, PK. Recommendations for surveillance of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28(2):140–145.Google Scholar
11.Sorg, JA, Dineen, SS. Laboratory maintenance of Clostridium difficile. Curt Protoc Microbiol 2009;12:9A.1.1–9A.1.10.Google Scholar
12.Rinttila, T, Kassinen, A, Mahnen, E, Krogius, L, Palva, A. Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA-targeted primers for quantification of pathogenic and indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real-time PCR. J Appi Microbiol 2004;97(6):1166–1177.Google Scholar
13.Persson, S, Torpdahl, M, Olsen, KE. New multiplex PCR method for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A (tcdA) and toxin B (tcdB) and the binary toxin (cdtA/cdtB) genes applied to a Danish strain collection. Clin Microbiol Infect 2008;14(11):1057–1064.Google Scholar
14.Benjamini, Y, Yekutieli, D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat 2001;29(4):1165–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Machin, D, Campbell, MJ, Fayers, PM, Pinol, APU. Sample Size Tables for Clinical Studies. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1997.Google Scholar
16.Balmer, O, Tanner, M. Prevalence and implications of multiple-strain infections. Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11(11):868–878.Google Scholar
17.Bordello, SP, Honour, P. Concomitance of cytotoxigenic and non-cytotoxigenic Clostridium difficile in stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1983;18(4):1006–1007.Google Scholar
18.Sharp, J, Poxton, IR. An immunochemical method for fingerprinting Clostridium difficile. J Immunol Methods 1985;83(2):241–248.Google Scholar
19.Barketi-Klai, A, Hoys, S, Lambert-Bordes, S, Collignon, A, Kansau, I. Role of fibronectin-binding protein A in Clostridium difficile intestinal colonization. J Med Microbiol 2011;60(8):1155–1161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Merrigan, MM, Sambol, SP, Johnson, S, Gerding, DN. New approach to the management of Clostridium difficile infection: colonisation with non-toxigenic C. difficile during daily ampicillin or ceftriaxone administration. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009; 33(suppl 1):S46–S50.Google Scholar