Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:49:12.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Decade of Prevalence Surveys in a Tertiary-Care Center: Trends in Nosocomial Infection Rates, Device Utilization, and Patient Acuity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Jeffrey W. Weinstein
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut Yale-New Haven Hospital, and the Infectious Diseases Section, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Dorothy Mazon
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Elizabeth Pantelick
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Patricia Reagan-Cirincione
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Louise M. Dembry
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut Yale-New Haven Hospital, and the Infectious Diseases Section, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Walter J. Hierholzer Jr*
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut Yale-New Haven Hospital, and the Infectious Diseases Section, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
*
Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, 326 GEB, Yale-New Haven Hospital, 20 York St, New Haven, CT 06504

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the usefulness of repeated prevalence surveys to determine trends in the rates of nosocomial infections and to detect changes in risk factors (eg, use of invasive devices) associated with nosocomial infections.

Patients And Methods:

Ten annual prevalence surveys were conducted by trained infection control practitioners between 1985 and 1995 for acute-care patients on the medical, surgical, pediatric, and obstetric-gynecologic services at a 900-bed, tertiary-care, teaching hospital with 750 acute-care beds. The same methods of chart review and concurrent reporting from nursing, the microbiology and clinical laboratory, and the pharmacy were used each year to collect data on the prevalence of nosocomial infections, invasive-device utilization, and abnormal laboratory indicators. Although data were collected on a single day, a period-prevalence study approach was used, because charts were reviewed for any infection data occurring within the 7 days prior to the survey.

Results:

The hospital census for acute-care patients, as measured by the prevalence surveys, declined sharply over the 10 years, from 673 to 575 patients (P=.02). However, the medical service census increased from 150 to 188 patients (P=.01). During the same period, there was a significant decrease in the mean length of stay, from 7.3 to 6.0 days (P=.01), and a concomitant increase in the mean diagnosis-related-group case-mix index, from 1.03 to 1.24 (P=.001). Overall, nosocomial infection rates remained unchanged over the study period (mean of 9.85 infections per 100 patients), but rates of nosocomial bloodstream infection increased from 0.0% in 1985 to 2.3% in 1995 (P=.05). Nosocomial infection rates were significantly higher on the medical and surgical services than on other services (P<.001). Utilization rates increased significantly for Foley catheters (9.0% to 16.0%, P=.002) and ventilators (5.0% to 8.0%, P=.05).

Conclusions:

Despite apparent increases in the severity of illness of our patients, overall rates of nosocomial infection remained stable during a decade of study. Rates of nosocomial bloodstream infection increased, in parallel with National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System data. We found repeated prevalence surveys to be useful in following trends and rates of infection, device utilization, and abnormal laboratory values among patients at our institution. Such methodologies can be valuable and low-cost components of a comprehensive infection surveillance, prevention, and control program and other potential quality-improvement initiatives, because they enable better annual planning of departmental strategies to meet hospital needs

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Hughes, JM. Nosocomial infection surveillance in the United States: historical perspective. Infect Control 1987;8:450453.Google Scholar
2.Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128140.Google Scholar
3.Gaynes, RP, Culver, DH, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Banerjee, SN, Edwards, JR, et al. The National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System: plans for the 1990s and beyond. Am J Med 1991;91(suppl 3B):116S120S.Google Scholar
4.Centers for Disease Control. Nosocomial infection rates for interhospital comparison: limitations and possible solutions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:609621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Rhame, FS, Sudderth, WD. Incidence and prevalence as used in the analysis of the occurrence of nosocomial infections. Am J Epidemiol 1981;113:111.Google Scholar
6.McGowan, JE, Finland, M. Infection and antibiotic usage at Boston City Hospital: changes in prevalence during the decade 1964-1973. J Infect Dis 1974;129:421428.Google Scholar
7.Huth, TS, Burke, JP. Infections and antibiotic use in a community hospital, 1971-1990. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:525534.Google Scholar
8.Centers for Disease Control. National Nosocomial Infection Study Site Definition Manual, 1975. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control; 1975.Google Scholar
9.Meers, PD, Ayliffe, GAJ, Emmerson, AM, Leigh, DA, Mayon-White, RT, Mackintosh, CA, et al. Report on the national survey of infection in hospitals. J Hosp Infect 1981;2(suppl):151.Google Scholar
10.EPINE working group. Prevalence of hospital-acquired infections in Spain. J Hosp Infect 1992;20:113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Sartor, C, Sambuc, R, Bimar, MC, Gulian, C, DeMicco, P. Prevalence surveys of nosocomial infections using a random sampling method in Marseille hospitals. J Hosp Infect 1995;29:209216.Google Scholar
12.Emmerson, AM, Enstone, JE, Kelsey, MC. The second national prevalence survey of infection in hospitals: methodology. j Hosp Infect 1995;30:729.Google Scholar
13.Freeman, J, Hutchison, GB. Prevalence, incidence, and duration. Am J Epidemiol 1980;112:707723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Chamberland, ME, Petersen, LR, Munn, VP, White, CR, Johnson, ES, Busch, MP, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus infection among health care workers who donate blood. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:269273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Vincent, JL, Bihari, DJ, Suter, PM, Bruining, HA, White, J, Nicolas-Chanoin, MH, et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe: results of the European prevalence of infection in intensive care (EPIC) study. JAMA 1995;274:639644.Google Scholar
16.Freeman, J, McGowan, JE. Day-specific incidence of nosocomial infection estimated from a prevalence survey. Am J Epidemiol 1981;114:888901.Google Scholar
17.French, GL, Wong, SL, Cheng, AFB, Donnan, S. Repeated prevalence surveys for monitoring the effectiveness of hospital infection control. Lancet 1989;2:10211023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Banerjee, SN, Emori, TG, Culver, DH, Gaynes, RP, Jarvis, WR, Horan, T, et al. Secular trends in nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in the United States, 1980-1989. Am J Med 1991;91(suppl 3B):86S89S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed