Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T05:54:37.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Insidious Nosocomial Outbreak Due to Salmonella enteritidis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Cristina Guallar ,
Javier Ariza ,
Angeles Dominguez ,
Carmen Peña ,
Imma Grau ,
R. Verdaguer ,
LLum Torrens  and
Francisco Gudiol
Cristina Guallar
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital de Bellvitge, Universidad de Barcelona, Spain
Javier Ariza*
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital de Bellvitge, Universidad de Barcelona, Spain
Angeles Dominguez
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Hospital de Bellvitge, Universidad de Barcelona, Spain
Carmen Peña
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital de Bellvitge, Universidad de Barcelona, Spain
Imma Grau
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital de Bellvitge, Universidad de Barcelona, Spain
R. Verdaguer
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Hospital de Bellvitge, Universidad de Barcelona, Spain
LLum Torrens
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, Hospital de Bellvitge, Universidad de Barcelona, Spain
Francisco Gudiol
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital de Bellvitge, Universidad de Barcelona, Spain
*
Infectious Disease Service, Hospital de Bellvitge, C/Feixa Llarga S/N, 08907 l'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To investigate an increase in the number of Salmonella enteritidis isolates detected in a large hospital to ascertain whether it was due to a nosocomial source, to identify the mechanisms of transmission, and to institute effective control measures to prevent future episodes.

Design:

Observational study, survey of all microbiological samples positive for S. enteritidis detected in the hospital, outbreak investigation, and review of the literature.

Setting:

A tertiary-care teaching hospital for adults in Barcelona, Spain.

Results:

During a 7-month period from May to November 1998, we identified 22 inpatients with S. enteritidis infection for whom nosocomial acquisition was strongly suspected. The attack rate was 0.138 per 1,000 patient-days. All affected patients were immunosuppressed and overall mortality was 41% (9 of 22). A sample of a meal cooked in the kitchen was culture positive for S. enteritidis. All isolates shared the same antibiotic susceptibility pattern and all except one shared the same pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern, but PFGE could not differentiate between outbreak-related and control strains. After compliance with kitchen hygiene procedures was emphasized and cleansing was intensified, no more cases were detected.

Conclusions:

Apparently, sporadic cases of S. enteritidis may be part of an outbreak with a low attack rate. A small but persistent inoculum affecting only individuals with special predisposition for Salmonella infection might account for this. Suspicion should be raised in hospitals and institutions with a highly susceptible population.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 2004 , pp. 10 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Waites, WM, Arburthnott, JP. Foodborne illness: an overview. Lancet 1990;336:722–725.Google Scholar
2.Blaser, MJ. How safe is our food? Lessons from an outbreak of salmo-nellosis. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1324–1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hennessy, TW, Hedberg, CW, Slutsker, L, et al.A national outbreak of Salmonella enteritidis infections from ice cream. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1281–1286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 1996. MMWR 1997;46:258–261.Google Scholar
5.González-Hevia, MA, Cruz Martín, M, Lobato, MJ, Gutiérrez, F, Solano, P, Alvarez Riesgo, JA. Salmonella and salmonellosis in the Asturias District, Spain during a seven year-period (1990-1996). Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 1999;17:166–170.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Mishu, B, Koehler, J, Lee, LA, et al.Outbreaks of Salmonella enteritidis infections in the United States, 1985-1991. J Infect Dis 1994;169:547–552.Google Scholar
7.St. Louis, ME, Morse, DL, Potter, ME, et al.The emergence of Grade A eggs as a major source of Salmonella enteritidis infections. JAMA 1988;259:2103–2107.Google Scholar
8.Dorronsoro, I, Sarasqueta, R, Perfecto, B, Gonzalez, AI. Epidemiologia de las gastroenteritis por Salmonella: 1983-1994. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 1996;14:604–607.Google Scholar
9.Rodrigue, DC, Tauxe, RV, Rowe, B. International increase in Salmonella enteritidis: a new pandemie? Epidemiol Infect 1990;105:21–27.Google Scholar
10.Baird-Parker, AC. Foodborne salmonellosis. Lancet 1990;336:1231–1235.Google Scholar
11.González-Hevia, MA, Alvarez, JA, Mendoza, MC. Salmonella enterica in the Aviles health district (Asturias): microbiological, clinical, and epidemiological aspects. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 1990;3:144–147.Google Scholar
12.Hedberg, CW, David, MJ, White, KE, Mac Donald, KL, Osterholm, MT. Róle of egg consumption in sporadic Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium infections in Minnesota. J Infect Dis 1993;167:107–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreaks of Salmonella serotype enteritidis infection associated with consumption of raw shell eggs in United States, 1994-1995. JAMA 1996;276:1017–1019.Google Scholar
14.de Louvois, J. Salmonella contamination of eggs. Lancet 1993;342:366–367.Google Scholar
15.Humphrey, TJ, Chapman, PA, Rowe, B, Gilbert, RJ. A comparative study of the heat resistance of Salmonella in homogenized whole egg, egg yolk or albumen. Epidemiol Infect 1990;104:237–241.Google Scholar
16.Humphrey, TJ, Whitehead, A, Gawler, AH, Henley, A, Rowe, B. Numbers of Salmonella enteritidis in the contents of naturally contaminated hens' eggs. Epidemiol Infect 1991;106:489–496.Google Scholar
17.Rampling, A. Salmonella enteritidis five years on. Lancet 1993;342:317–318.Google Scholar
18.Palmer, SR. Outbreak investigation: the need for “quick and clean” epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 1995;24(suppl 1):S34–S38.Google Scholar
19.Usera, MA, Cano, R, Echeita, A. Analysis of Salmonella serotypes isolated in Spain in 1988-1992. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 1995;13:138–145.Google Scholar
20.Telzak, EE, Budnick, LD, Greenberg, MS, et al.A nosocomial outbreak of Salmonella enteritidis infection due to the consumption of raw eggs. N Engl J Med 1990;323:394–397.Google Scholar
21.Blaser, MJ, Feldman, RA. From the Center for Disease Control: Salmonella bacteremia—reports to the Center for Disease Control, 1968-1979. J Infect Dis 1981;143:743–746.Google Scholar
22.Blaser, MJ, Newman, LS. A review of human salmonellosis: I. Infective dose. Review of Infections Diseases 1982;4:1096–1106.Google Scholar
23.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, ed. 4. Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1997. Approved standard M7-A4.Google Scholar
24.Maslow, JN, Slutsky, AM, Arbeit, RD. Application of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to molecular epidemiology. In: Persing, DH, Smith, TF, Tenover, FC, White, TJ, eds. Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1993:563–571.Google Scholar
25.Tenover, FC, Arbeit, RD, Goering, RB, et al.Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction pattern produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2233–2239.Google Scholar
26.Wall, PG, Ryan, MJ, Ward, LR, Rowe, B. Outbreaks of salmonellosis in hospitals in England and Wales: 1992-1994. J Hosp Infect 1996;33:181–190.Google Scholar
27.Lacey, SL, Buckingham, SE. Isolation of Salmonella enteritidis from cook-chill food distributed to hospital patients. J Hosp infect 1993;25:133–136.Google Scholar
28.Roberts, JA, Sockett, PN, Gill, ON. Economie impact of a nationwide outbreak of salmonellosis: cost-benefit of early intervention. BMJ 1989;298:1227–1230.Google Scholar
29.Gudiol, F, Heredia, L, Sánchez, C. Probability of bacteremia in Salmonella gastroenteritis. Med Clin (Barc) 1983;80:577–579.Google Scholar
30.Garcia-Rodriguez, JA, Garcia-Sánchez, JE, Muñoz-Bellido, JL, Garcia-Garcia, MI. Focal salmonellosis in Spain: presentation of 14 cases and review of the literature. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 1990;8:134–143.Google ScholarPubMed
31.L'Ecuyer, PB, Diego, J, Murphy, D, et al.Outbreak of gastroenteritis due to Salmonella senftenberg. Clin Infect Dis 1996;23:734–742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Riley, LW, DiFerdinando, GT Jr, DeMelfi, TM, Cohen, ML. Evaluation of isolated cases of salmonellosis by plasmid profile analysis: introduction and transmission of a bacterial clone by a precooked roast beef. J Infect Dis 1983;148:12–17.Google Scholar
33.Mishu, B, Griffin, PM, Tauxe, RV, Cameron, DN, Hutcheson, RH, Schaffner, W. Salmonella enteritidis gastroenteritis transmitted by intact chicken eggs. Ann Intern Med 1991;115:190–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Martinetti, G, Altwegg, M. rRNA gene restriction patterns and plasmid analysis as a tool for typing Salmonella enteritidis. Res Microbiol 1990;141:1151–1162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Boonmar, S, Bangtrakulnonth, A, Pomrunangwong, S, et al.Epidemiological analysis of Salmonella enteritidis isolates from humans and broiler chickens in Thailand by phage typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:971–974.Google Scholar
36.Thong, KL, Ngeow, YF, Altwegg, M, Navaratnam, P, Pang, T. Molecular analysis of Salmonella enteritidis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and ribotyping. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:1070–1074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Ahmed, R, Soule, G, Demczuk, WH, et al.Epidemiologic typing of Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis in a Canada-wide outbreak of gastroenteritis due to contaminated cheese. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:2403–2406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Nauerby, B, Pedersen, K, Dietz, HH, Madsen, M. Comparison of Danish isolates of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis PT9a and PT11 from hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) and humans by plasmid profiling and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:3631–3635.Google Scholar
39.Rushdy, AA, Wall, R, Seng, C, et al.Application of molecular methods to a nosocomial outbreak of Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4. J Hosp Infect 1997;36:123–131.Google Scholar
40.Skibsted, U, Baggesen, DL, Dessau, R, Lisby, G. Random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD), pulsed-field electrophoresis (PFGE) and phage-typing in the analysis of a hospital outbreak of Salmonella enteritidis. J Hosp Infect 1998;8:207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41.Hickman-Brenner, FW, Stubbs, AD, Farmer, JJ 3rd. Phage typing of Salmonella enteritidis in the United States. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:2817–2823.Google Scholar
42.Liebana, E, Garcia-Migura, L, Breslin, MF, Davies, RH, Woodward, MJ. Diversity of strains of Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis from English poultry farms assessed by multiple genetic fingerprinting. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:154–161.Google Scholar