Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T01:23:08.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Removal of Mycobacterium Species by Breathing Circuit Filters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Abstract

Breathing circuit filters (BCFs) are used in respiratory and critical-care settings for humidification of air and to limit transmission of respiratory pathogens. Three types of BCFs (Pall BB 25A, BB 100, and HME 15-22) were evaluated (in triplicate) for removal of Mycobacterium species. Filters were challenged with aerosolized Mycobacterium bovis (a surrogate for Mycobacterium tuberculosis), at minimum total concentrations of 104 colony-forming units. No M bovis was recovered in the effluent, providing removal efficiencies of >99.99% to >99.999% for the filters tested.

Type
Concise Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Horan, TC, White, JW, Jarvis, WR, et al. Nosocomial infection surveillance. MMWR 1986;35:17S29S.Google Scholar
2. Wenzel, RP. Hospital-acquired pneumonia: overview of the current state of the art, prevention and control. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1989;8:5660.Google Scholar
3. Kochi, A. The global tuberculosis situation and the new control strategy of the World Health Organization. Tubercle 1991;72:16.Google Scholar
4. Centers for Disease Control. Meeting the challenge of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: summary of a conference. MMWR 1992;41:5157.Google Scholar
5. Gallagher, J, Strangeways, JEM, Allt-Graham, J. Contamination control in long-term ventilation; a clinical study using a heat and moisture exchanging filter. Anaesthesia 1987;42:476481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Ball, PR, Saunders, D. Viral removal efficiency of the Pall Ultipor Breathing Filter System. Pall Technical Report BM2115a. Portsmouth, UK: Pall Europe, Ltd; 1987.Google Scholar
7. Hedley, RM, Allt-Graham, J. A comparison of the filtration properties of heat and moisture exchangers, 1992. Anaesthesia 1992;47:414420.Google Scholar
8. Lee, MG, Ford, JL, Hunt, PB, Ireland, DS, Swanson, PW. Bacterial retention properties of heat and moisture exchange filters. Br J Anaesth 1992;69:522525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Tuberculocidal activity of disinfectants. In: Williams, S, ed. Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC. 14th ed. Arlington, VA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1984:7374.Google Scholar
10. Duberstein, R, Howard, G. Sterile filtration of gases: a bacterial aerosol challenge test. J Parenter Drug Assoc 1978;32:192198.Google ScholarPubMed
11. Holt, JG, Krieg, NR, Sneath, PHA, Staley, JT, Williams, ST, eds. In: Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 9th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1993.Google Scholar
12. Hermans, PWM, van Soolingen, D, Bik, EM, de Haas, JW, Dale, PEW, van Embden, JDA. The insertion element IS987 from M bovis is located in a hot spot integration region for insertion elements in M tuberculosis complex strains. Infect Immun 1991;59:26952705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Baess, I. Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness among species of slowly-growing mycobacteria. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1979;B87:221226.Google Scholar
14. Magnusson, M. Classification and identification of mycobacteria on the basis of sensitin specificity. In: Meissner, D, Schmiedel, A, Nelles, G, Pfaffenberg, P, eds. Mykobakterien und ykobakterielle Krankheiten. Jena, Federal Republic of Germany: Gustav Fisher Verlag; 1980:319348.Google Scholar
15. Stanford, JL, Grange, JM. The meaning and structure of species as applied to mycobacteria. Tubercle 1974;55:143152.Google Scholar