Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T16:42:43.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physical and Chemical Composition of Hospital Waste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Chih-Shan Li  and
Fu-Tien Jenq
Chih-Shan Li*
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
Fu-Tien Jenq
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
*
Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For selecting the most efficient treatment method of hospital waste, the composition analysis is generally considered to be the fundamental information. Currently, there are few studies regarding the characteristics of hospital waste. This study evaluated the physical and elemental composition of the hospital waste at the National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH). The results should help us design an incinerator for the treatment of infectious waste, plastic syringes, pathological waste, and kitchen waste. During the study period, the estimated daily waste generation rate at NTUH was 4,600 kg/day, which consisted of 4,100 kg/day noninfectious refuse, 340 kg/day infectious waste, 70 kg/day kitchen waste, 50 kg/day pathological waste, and 40 kg/day plastic syringes. The NTUH waste consisted of 99.02% combustible wastes and 0.97% noncombustible wastes by mass. The combustibie wastes constituted paper (16.17%), textiles (9.77%), cardboard, wood, and leaves (1.12%), food waste (21.5 1%), and plastics (50.45%). The noncombustible waste included 0.40% metal and 0.57% glass. Furthermore, the analysis indicated that the wastes contained 38% moisture, 4% ashes, and 58% solid with an average heat value of 3,400 kcal/kg. From the elemental analysis, the dominant elements were found to be carbon (34%) and oxygen (15%).

Type
Brief Report
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , March 1993 , pp. 145 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rutala, WA, Mayhall, CG. Medical waste. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992;13:38–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. USEPA. Hospital Waste Combustion Study. Data gathering phase. Final draft (prepared by the Tadian Corporation); 1987.Google Scholar
3. Rutala, WA. Management of infection waste by United States hospitals. Presented at the 28th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; Los Angeles, Calif; 1988.Google Scholar
4. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Finding the Rx for Managing Medical Wastes. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1990:OTA-0-459.Google Scholar
5. Glasser, H, Chang, DPY. An analysis of biomedical waste incineration. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 1991;41:1180–1188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Harris, JC, Larsen, DJ, Rechsteiner, CE, Thrun, KE. Combustion of Hazardous Wastes: Sampling and Analysis Methods. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications; 1986.Google Scholar
7. Brunner, CR. Hazardous Air Emissions from Incineration. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall; 1986.Google Scholar
8. Marrack, D. Hospital red bag waste. /Air Waste Manage Assoc. 1988;38:1309–1311.Google ScholarPubMed
9. COME. Incinerator Design and Operating Criteria. Vol. 2. Biomedical Waste Incinerators; 1986.Google Scholar
10. California Air Resources Board. Raw Data from CARB Preliminary Survey of California BMWI's. Stationary Source Division; 1989.Google Scholar