Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T04:19:31.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Work–Nonwork Research: Moving Toward a Scientist–Practitioner Collaboration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Jacqueline K. Deuling*
Affiliation:
Roosevelt University
Alison Mallard
Affiliation:
HRCatalyst and I/O AT WORK
*
E-mail: jdeuling@roosevelt.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, Roosevelt University, 1400 N. Roosevelt Blvd., Schaumburg, IL 60173

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank Linda Matzigkeit at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Bruce Hamilton at InterContinental Hotels Group for their help in stimulating some of the ideas presented in this commentary.

References

Goldstein, I., & Ford, J. K. (2002). Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Baltes, B. B., & Matthews, R. A. (2011). How work–family research can finally have an impact in organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 352369. Google Scholar
Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., & Mabon, H. (2002). Utility analysis: A review and analysis at the turn of the century. In Anderson, N., Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, Volume 1: Personnel psychology (pp. 383384). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar