Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T01:27:45.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Has There Been So Much JDM–IOOB Cross-Fertilization?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Glen Whyte
Glen Whyte*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
*
E-mail: whyte@rotman.utoronto.ca, Address: Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, 105 St. George St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3E6.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 421 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baron, R. S. (2005). So right, it's wrong: Groupthink and the ubiquitous nature of self-censorship. In Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp 219–253). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B. (2001). The science of persuasion. Scientific American, 284, 76–81. Google Scholar
Dalal, R. S., Bonaccio, S., Highhouse, S., Ilgen, D. R., Mohammed, S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2010). What if industrial–organizational psychology decided to take workplace decisions seriously? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 386–405. Google Scholar
Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 79–109. Google Scholar
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291. Google Scholar
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
Schweitzer, M. E., Ordonez, L. D., & Duouma, B. (2004). Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 422–432. Google Scholar
Whyte, G. (1989). Groupthink reconsidered. Academy of Management Review, 14, 40–56. Google Scholar
Whyte, G. (1998). Recasting Janis's groupthink model: The key role of collective efficacy in decision fiascoes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 185–209. Google Scholar