Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:04:08.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thurstone Might Have Been Right About Attitudes, but Drasgow, Chernyshenko, and Stark Fail to Make the Case for Personality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Steven Paul Reise
Steven Paul Reise*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
*
E-mail: reise@psych.ucla.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, Franz Hall, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 485 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Block, J. (1961). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Google Scholar
Block, J. (2010). The five factor framing of personality and beyond: Some ruminations. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 2–25. Google Scholar
Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305–315. Google Scholar
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203–219. Google Scholar
Drasgow, F., Chernyshenko, O. S., and Stark, S. (2010). 75 years after Likert: Thurstone was right! Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 465–476.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D. (2004). Why rejection hurts: A common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 294–300. Google Scholar
Friedman, H. S., Tucker, J. S., Schwartz, J. E., Tomlinson-Keasey, C., Martin, L. R., Wingard, D. L., & Criqui, M. H. (1995). Psychosocial and behavioral predictors of longevity: The aging and death of the “Termites.” American Psychologist, 50, 69–78. Google Scholar
Furr, R. M., Wagerman, S. A., & Funder, D. C. (2010). Personality as manifest in behavior: Direct behavioral observation using the revised Riverside Behavioral Q-Sort (RBQ-3.0). In Agnew, C. R., Carlston, D. E., Graziano, W. G., & Kelly, J. R. (Eds.), Then a miracle occurs: Focusing on behavior in social psychological theory and research (pp. 186–204). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A., & Funder, D. C. (2008). Beyond self-report in the study of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: Correlations with acquaintance reports, clinician judgments and directly observed social behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 643–659.Google Scholar
Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 401–421. Google Scholar
Reise, S. P. (in press). The emergence of item response theory (IRT) models and the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Austrian Journal of Statistics.Google Scholar
Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (2003). How many IRT parameters does it take to model psychopathology items. Psychological Methods, 8, 164–184. Google Scholar
Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27–48. Google Scholar
Stubbe, J. H., Poshuma, D., Boomsma, D. I., & De Geus, J. C. (2005). Heritability of life satisfaction in adults: A twin-family study. Psychological Medicine, 35, 1581–1588. Google Scholar
Tellegen, A. (1988). The analysis of consistency in personality assessment. Journal of Personality, 56, 621–663. Google Scholar
Tellegen, A. (1991). Personality traits: Issues of definition, evidence and assessment. In Cichetti, D., & Grove, W. (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul Everett Meehl (pp. 10–35). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar
Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (2008). Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the multidimensional personality questionnaire. The Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment.In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G., & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and testing: Vol. II. Personality measurement and assessment (pp. 254–285). London: Sage.Google Scholar