Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T13:25:46.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studying the Influence of Stereotypes on Personnel Decisions in the Real World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Jeff W. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Personnel Decisions Research Institutes
Caroline C. Cochran
Affiliation:
Personnel Decisions Research Institutes
*
E-mail: jeff.johnson@pdri.com, Address: Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, 650 3rd Avenue South, Suite 1350, Minneapolis, MN 55402

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cochran, C. C. (1999). Gender influences on the process and outcomes of rating performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Conway, J. M. (1999). Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 313.Google Scholar
Darlington, R. B. (1968). Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 161182.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., McGehee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 14641480.Google Scholar
Hobson, C. J., & Gibson, F. W. (1983). Policy capturing as an approach to understanding and improving performance appraisal: A review of the literature. Academy of Management Review, 8, 640649.Google Scholar
Hobson, C. J., Mendel, R. M., & Gibson, F. W. (1981). Clarifying performance appraisal criteria. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 164188.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 119.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. W. (2001). The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 984996.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. W., & LeBreton, J. M. (2004). History and use of relative importance indices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 238257.Google Scholar
Landy, F. J. (2008). Stereotypes, bias, and personnel decisions: Strange and stranger. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 379392.Google Scholar
Lievens, F., Conway, J. M., & De Corte, W. (2008). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to job performance ratings: Do rater source and team-based culture matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 1127.Google Scholar
Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Cognitive theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., pp. 162). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Robie, C., Johnson, K. M., Nilsen, D., & Hazucha, J. (2001). The right stuff: Understanding cultural differences in leadership performance. Journal of Management Development, 20, 639650.Google Scholar