Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T07:20:11.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stereotype Threat Spillover: Why Stereotype Threat Is More Useful for Organizations Than It Seems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Sonia K. Kang  and
Michael Inzlicht
Sonia K. Kang*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Michael Inzlicht
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
*
E-mail: sonia.kang@rotman.utoronto.ca, Address: Institute for Management and Innovation, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga and Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E6, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 452 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chasteen, A. L., Kang, S. K., & Remedios, J. D. (2012). Aging and stereotype threat: Development, process, and interventions. In Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 202–216). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. L., Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Garcia, J. (2012). An identity threat perspective on intervention. In Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 280–296). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion, 6, 409–434.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., & Derakshan, N. (2011). New perspectives in attentional control theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 955–960.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336–353.Google Scholar
Inzlicht, M., & Kang, S. K. (2010). Stereotype threat spillover: How coping with threats to social identity affects aggression, eating, decision making, and attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 467–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inzlicht, M., Schmeichel, B. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2014). Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.009Google Scholar
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A. M., Legault, L., & Kang, S. K. (2011). Lingering effects: Stereotype threat hurts more than you think. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5, 227–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalokerinos, E. K., von Hippel, C., & Zacher, H. (2014). Is stereotype threat a useful construct for organizational psychology research and practice? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(3), 381–402.Google Scholar
Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, J. R., Williams, A. M., & Hambarchyan, M. (2013). Are all interventions created equal? A multi-threat approach to tailoring stereotype threat interventions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 277–288.Google Scholar