Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T19:55:30.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Need for Even Further Clarity About Cleary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Steven F. Cronshaw  and
Greg A. Chung-Yan
Steven F. Cronshaw*
Affiliation:
University of Northern British Columbia
Greg A. Chung-Yan
Affiliation:
University of Windsor
*
E-mail: cronshaw@unbc.ca, Address: School of Business, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada V2N 4Z9
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 206 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

School of Business, University of Northern British Columbia

**

Department of Psychology, University of Windsor.

References

Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., et al. (2000). Gene ontology tool for the unification of biology (The Gene Ontology Consortium). Nature Genetics, 25, 25–29. Retrieved on March 6, 2010, from https://bioinformatics.cs.vt.edu/easychair/Ashburner_NatGenet_2000.pdf).Google Scholar
Audi, R. (1999). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brogden, H. E., & Taylor, E. K. (1950). The theory and classification of criterion bias. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10, 159–183.Google Scholar
Chung-Yan, G. A., & Cronshaw, S. F. (2002). A critical re-examination and analysis of cognitive ability tests using the Thorndike model of fairness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 489–509.Google Scholar
Cleary, T. A. (1968). Test bias: Prediction of grades of Negro and White students in integrated colleges. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 115–124.Google Scholar
Cole, N. S. (1973). Bias in selection. Journal of Educational Measurement, 10, 237–255.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2000). Racial and gender bias in ability and achievement tests: Resolving the apparent paradox. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 151–158.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Linn, R. L. (1973). Fair test use in selection. Review of Educational Research, 43, 139–161.Google Scholar
Meade, A. W., & Tonidandel, S. (2010). Not seeing clearly with Cleary: What test bias analyses do and do not tell us. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3, 192–205.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). (pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Petersen, N. S., & Novick, M. R. (1976). Evaluation of some models for culture-fair selection. Journal of Educational Measurement, 13, 3–29.Google Scholar
Thorndike, R. L. (1971). Concepts of culture-fairness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, 63–70.Google Scholar