Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T12:38:05.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Many forces at play: Ethical dilemmas in academic research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2021

Steven Zhou Open the ORCID record for Steven Zhou [Opens in a new window]  and
James G. Field
Steven Zhou*
Affiliation:
George Mason University
James G. Field
Affiliation:
West Virginia University – John Chambers College of Business and Economics
*
*Corresponding author. Email: szhou9@gmu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 2021 , pp. 360 - 366
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguinis, H., Werner, S., Lanza Abbott, J., Angert, C., Park, J. H., & Kohlhausen, D. (2010). Customer-centric science: Reporting significant research results with rigor, relevance, and practical impact in mind. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 515–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109333339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altbach, P. G., & de Wit, H. (2018, September 7). Too much academic research is being published. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20180905095203579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banal-Estañol, A., Jofre-Bonet, M., & Lawson, C. (2015). The double-edged sword of industry collaboration: Evidence from engineering academics in the UK. Research Policy, 44(6), 1160–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, G. C., O’Boyle, E. H., Pollack, J. M., White, C. D., Batchelor, J. H., Whelpley, C. E., Abston, K. A., Bennett, A. A., & Adkins, C. L. (2016). Questions about questionable research practices in the field of management. Journal of Management, 42(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315619011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosco, F. A., Aguinis, H., Field, J. G., Pierce, C. A., & Dalton, D. R. (2016). HARKing’s threat to organizational research: Evidence from primary and meta-analytic sources. Personnel Psychology, 69(3), 709–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosco, F. A., Uggerslev, K. L., & Steel, P. (2017). MetaBUS as a vehicle for facilitating meta- analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaert, J., Landoni, P., Van Looy, B., & Verganti, R. (2015). Scientific yield from collaboration with industry: The relevance of researchers’ strategic approaches. Research Policy, 44(4), 990–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conn, S. (2016, December 14). Ask the ethicist, faculty edition. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2016/12/14/scholar-examines-some-ethical-dilemmas-academe-essay Google Scholar
Edwards, M. A., & Roy, S. (2017). Academic research in the 21st century: Maintaining scientific integrity in a climate of perverse incentives and hypercompetition. Environmental Engineering Science, 34(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2016.0223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. J. (2015). Everybody knows psychology is not a real science. American Psychologist, 70(6), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzales, J. E., & Cunningham, C. A. (2015, August). The promise of pre-registration in psychological research. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2015/08/pre-registration Google Scholar
Hancock, G., & Curran, P. (2020, February 18). Episode 15: Academia and the chamber of secrets. Quantitude. https://www.buzzsprout.com/639103/2746735-episode-15-academia-and-the-chamber-of-secrets Google Scholar
Hubler, S. (2020, October 26). Colleges slash budgets in the pandemic, with “nothing off-limits.” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/26/us/colleges-coronavirus-budget-cuts.html Google Scholar
Ilgen, D. R., & Bell, B. S. (2001). Conducting industrial and organizational psychological research: Institutional review of research in work organizations. Ethics & Behavior, 11(4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1104_03 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaschik, S. (2006, December 8). Rethinking tenure–and much more. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/12/08/rethinking-tenure-and-much moreGoogle Scholar
Lapierre, L. M., Matthews, R. A., Eby, L. T., Truxillo, D. M., Johnson, R. E., & Major, D. A. (2018). Recommended practices for academics to initiate and manage research partnerships with organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(4), 543–581. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2018.83 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2017). Ethics and values in industrial-organizational psychology (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2021). Forms of ethical dilemmas in industrial-organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 14(3), 297–319.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2012). Public skepticism of psychology. American Psychologist, 67(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023963 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2017). Psychology’s replication crisis and the grant culture: Righting the ship. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(4), 660–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616687745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, M. T., Conroy, S., & Lacerenza, C. N. (2018). It takes two to tango: The management of academic–industry partnerships requires multiple perspectives. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11(4), 625–629. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2018.125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Information Standards Organization (US). (2005). Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies. NISO Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. (2004). The market economy and the scientific commons. Research Policy, 33(3), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niles, M. T., Schimanski, L. A., McKiernan, E. C., & Alperin, J. P. (2020). Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations. PloS one, 15(3), e0228914. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228914 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), 943–952. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716 Google Scholar
Pannapacker, W. (2012). Should students be encouraged to pursue graduate education in the humanities? Journal of Markets & Morality, 15(2), 445–451. https://www.marketsandmorality.com/index.php/mandm/article/viewFile/800/758 Google Scholar
Piller, C. (2021, January 15). Many scientists citing two scandalous COVID-19 papers ignore their retractions. Science. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/01/many-scientists-citing-two-scandalous-covid- 19-papers-ignore-their-retractionsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinero, D. A. (2019, October 23). The path to professorship by the numbers and why mentorship matters. Behavioural & Social Sciences. https://socialsciences.nature.com/posts/55118-the-path-to-professorship-by-the-numbers-and-why-mentorship-matters Google Scholar
Ruggs, E. N., Law, C., Cox, C. B., Roehling, M. V., Wiener, R. L., Hebl, M. R., & Barron, L. (2013). Gone fishing: I–O psychologists’ missed opportunities to understand marginalized employees’ experiences with discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/iops.12007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, P. A., Guerin, R. J., Schill, A. L., Bhattacharya, A., Cunningham, T. R., Pandalai, S. P., Eggerth, D., & Stephenson, C. M. (2015). Considerations for incorporating “well-being” in public policy for workers and workplaces. American Journal of Public Health, 105(8), e31–e44. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302616 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villanueva, M. (2014). The hybrid imperative: Managing post-graduation employment in the humanities. In Progress Journal. http://inprogressjournal.net/current-issue-2014/the-hybrid-imperative-managing-post-graduation-employment-in-the-humanities Google Scholar
Von Bergen, C. W., & Bressler, M. S. (2017). Academe’s unspoken ethical dilemma: Author inflation in higher education. Research in Higher Education Journal, 32, Article EJ1148909. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1148909 Google Scholar
Zhou, S., & Kuykendall, L. (2021, April 15–17). When infrastructure and ethics collide: A panel on ethical policy making in higher ed [Panel discussion]. The 36th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Online.Google Scholar