Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:30:19.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Juggling in heels: The struggle of female professors to balance civility and free speech without suffering from negative student evaluations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2020

Caitlin M. Lapine  and
Aditi Rabindra Sachdev
Caitlin M. Lapine*
Affiliation:
Touro College
Aditi Rabindra Sachdev
Affiliation:
Hofstra University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: clapine1@pride.hofstra.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 391 - 394
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cortina, L. M., Cortina, M. G., & Cortina, M. J. (2019). Regulating rude: Tensions between free speech and civility in academic employment. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(4), 357–375.Google Scholar
Dwyer, D. J., & Ganster, D. C. (1991). The effects of job demands and control on employee attendance and satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Alayli, A., Hansen-Brown, A. A., and Ceynar, M. (2018). Dancing backwards in high heels: Female professors experience more work demands and special favor requests, particularly from academically entitled students. Sex Roles, 79, 136–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, A. S., Butts, M. M., Yuan, Z., Rosen, R. L., & Sliter, M. T. (2018). Further understanding incivility in the workplace: The effects of gender, agency, and communion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(4), 362–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilies, R., Dimotakis, N., & De Pater, I. E. (2010). Psychological and physiological reactions to high workloads: Implications for well-being. Personnel Psychology, 63, 407–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsbergis, P. A. (1988). Occupational stress among health care workers: A test of the Job Demands–Control Model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9(3), 217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, A. K., Tinsley, C. H., Cheldelin, S., & Amanatullah, E. T. (2010). Likeability v. competence: The impossible choice faced by female politicians, attenuated by lawyers. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 17, 363–384.Google Scholar