Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T13:06:22.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Workforce Trends and Changes on Organizational Recruiting: A Practical Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2015

Jennifer Lee Gibson*
Affiliation:
Fors Marsh Group, LLC, Arlington, Virginia
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jennifer Lee Gibson, Fors Marsh Group, LLC, 1010 North Glebe Road, Suite 510, Arlington, VA 22201. E-mail: jgibson@forsmarshgroup.com

Extract

As a workforce evolves, it is important for employers to consider how trends and changes in the workforce have implications for organizational processes such as recruiting, selecting, training, and rewarding a cohort of workers (Costanza & Finkelstein, 2015). This article examines the practical aspects of workforce changes on organizations’ recruitment efforts. Particularly in the face of recruiting shortages, it is important to understand how to best to develop a large and qualified pool of applicants.

Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnett, J. J. (2013). The evidence for Generation We and against Generation Me. Emerging Adulthood, 1 (1), 510. http://doi.org/10.1177/2167696812466842Google Scholar
Berinsky, A. J. (2007). Assuming the costs of war: Events, elites, and American public support for military conflict. The Journal of Politics, 69 (4), 975997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camarota, S. (2005). The impact of immigration on the American workforce. Washington, DC: Center for Immigration Studies.Google Scholar
Costanza, D. P., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2015). Generationally based differences in the workplace: Is there a there there? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8 (4), 308323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberharter, V. V. (2012). The intergenerational transmission of occupational preferences, segregation, and wage inequality—Empirical evidence from Europe and the United States (Report No. 506–2012). Berlin, Germany: German Socio-Economic Panel Study.Google Scholar
Heller, D. E. (1999). The effects of tuition and state financial aid on public college enrollment. The Review of Higher Education, 23 (1), 6589.Google Scholar
Hillman, N. W., & Orians, E. L. (2013). Community college and labor market conditions: How does enrollment demand change relative to local unemployment rates? Research in Higher Education, 54 (7), 765780.Google Scholar
Kantrowitz, M. (2010). Countercyclicality of college enrollment trends. Retrieved from http://www.finaid.org/educators/20100816countercyclicality.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kleykamp, M. A. (2006). College, jobs, or the military? Enlistment during a time of war. Social Science Quarterly, 87 (2), 272290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mission: Readiness. (2012). Still too fat to fight. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2011). The military-civilian gap: War and sacrifice in the post-9/11 era. Washington, DC: Pew Social & Demographic Trends.Google Scholar
Pierre, K. O. (2005). Effect of increased operational tempo (Post 9/11) on retention rate of hospital corpsmen. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.Google Scholar
Sneddon, J. S., & Triest, Robert K. (2001). The impact of demographic change on U.S. labor markets. In J. S. Little & R. K. Triest (Eds.), Seismic shifts: The economic impact of demographic change: Conference series 46. Retrieved from http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/conf/conf46/Google Scholar
Trzesniewski, K. H., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). Rethinking “Generation Me”: A study of cohort effects from 1976–2006. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5 (1), 5875. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356789Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., & Kasser, T. (2013). Generational changes in materialism and work centrality, 1976–2007: Associations with temporal changes in societal insecurity and materialistic role modeling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39 (7), 883897. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213484586Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014a). How has labor force participation among young moms and dads changed? A comparison of two cohorts (Vol. 3, No. 19). Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-3/pdf/how-has-labor-force-participation-among-young-moms-and-dads-changed.pdfGoogle Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014b). Women in the labor force: A databook (Report No. 1049). Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/cps/women-in-the-labor-force-a-databook-2014.pdfGoogle Scholar