Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T17:12:55.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Educating Industrial–Organizational Psychologists for Science, Practice, and Social Responsibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Joel Lefkowitz*
Affiliation:
City University of New York (Emeritus)
*
E-mail: Joel.Lefkowitz@Baruch.cuny.edu, Address: Baruch College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York (Emeritus), New York, NY 10010

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychological Association (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 10601073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Byrne, Z. S., Hayes, T. L., McPhail, S. M., Hakel, M. D., Cortina, J. M., & McHenry, J. J. (2014). Educating industrial–organizational psychologists for science and practice: Where do we go from here? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(1), 214.Google Scholar
Carr, S. C., MacLachlan, M., & Furnhan, A. (2012). Humanitarian work psychology. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper-Thomas, H. D., & Anderson, N. (2007). Organizational socialization. In Rogelberg, S. G. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 581583). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Curricular Design Committee (2010). Report of the strategic planning committee for medical education. Yale School of Medicine, June. Retrieved from http://medicine.yale.edu/education/strategicplan/Overarching%20Goals%20of%20the%20Curriculum.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dierdorff, E. C., & Morgeson, F. P. (2013). Getting what the occupation gives: Exploring multilevel links between work design and occupational values. Personnel Psychology, 66, 687721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T. (1982). Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. (1989). Values from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In Eisenberg, N., Reykowski, J., & Staub, E. (Eds.), Social and moral values: Individual and societal perspectives (pp. 322). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Freidson, E. (1986). Professional powers: A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Damon, W. (2001). Good work: When excellence and ethics meet. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gasser, M., Butler, A., Waddilove, L., & Tan, R. (2004). Defining the profession of industrial-organizational psychology. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 42(2), 1520.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (2009). Everybody talks about organizational justice but nobody does anything about it. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 181195.Google Scholar
Haber, S. (1991). The quest for authority and honor in the American professions, 1750B1900. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hafferty, F. W. (1998). Beyond curriculum reform: Confronting medicine's hidden curriculum. Academic Medicine, 73(4), 403407.
Hall, R. T. (1975). Occupations and the social structure (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kimball, B. A. (1992). The “true professional ideal” in America: A history. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kimble, G. A. (1984). Psychology's two cultures. American Psychologist, 39, 833839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, A. (1947). Industrial psychology as management technique and as social science. American Psychologist, 2, 224229.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (1990). The scientist-practitioner model is not enough. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 28(1), 4752.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2003). Ethics and values in industrial-organizational psychology (p. 493). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2005). The values of industrial-organizational psychology: Who are we? The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 43(2), 1320.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2006). The constancy of ethics amidst the changing world of work. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 245268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should…expand its values to match the quality of its ethics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 439453.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2009). Promoting employee justice: It's even worse than that! Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 220224.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2010). Industrial-organizational psychology's recurring identity crises: It's a values issue! Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3(3), 293299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2011). The science, practice and morality of work psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4(1), 112115.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2012a). The morality of business: From humanitarian to humanistic work psychology. In Carr, S. C., MacLachlan, M., & Furnham, A. (Eds.), Humanitarian work psychology. London, England: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2012b). The impact of practice values on our science. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 50(2), 1622.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2013a). Values and ethics of a changing I-O psychology: A call to (further) action. In Olson-Buchanan, J. B., Koppes Bryan, L. L., & Thompson, L. F. (Eds.), Using I-O psychology for the common good: Helping those who help others. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Frontier Series. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2013b). Values of I-O psychology; another example: What and whom we don't study and what it all suggests about the profession. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 51(2), 46–56.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J., & Lowman, R. L. (2010). Ethics of employee selection. In Farr, J. L., & Tippins, N. T. (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 572591). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group..Google Scholar
Olson-Buchanan, J., Koppes Bryan, L., & Foster Thompson, L. (2013). Using I-O psychology for the common good: Helping those who help others. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Frontier Series. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Prilleltensky, I. (1997). Values, assumptions, and practices: Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist, 52, 517535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reese, H. W., & Fremouw, W. J. (1984). Normal and normative ethics in behavioral sciences. American Psychologist, 39, 863876.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1995). Philosophy of social science. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. M. (2003). Defining ourselves: I-O psychology's identity quest. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 41(1), 2133.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. M., & Ford, J. K. (2010). Organizational psychology and the tipping point of professional identity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 241258.Google Scholar
Steiner, A., & Yancey, G. B. (2013). The knowledge and skills employers desire when hiring an I-O psychologist. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 51(1), 5360.Google Scholar
Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In Staw, B. W. (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 209264). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Vasquez, M. J. T. (2012). Psychology and social justice: Why we do what we do. American Psychologist, 67(5), 337346.Google Scholar