Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:20:05.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calling on Male Allies to Promote Gender Equity in I-O Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2018

Shannon Cheng ,
Linnea Ng ,
Rachel C. E. Trump-Steele ,
Abby Corrington  and
Mikki Hebl
Shannon Cheng*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Rice University
Linnea Ng
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Rice University
Rachel C. E. Trump-Steele
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Rice University
Abby Corrington
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Rice University
Mikki Hebl
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Rice University
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Shannon Cheng, Department of Psychology, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005-1892. E-mail: shannon.k.cheng@rice.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As Gardner, Ryan, and Snoeyink (2018) state, their findings on gender representation in industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology indicate that “the profession as a whole falls into the category of ‘not walking the talk’” (p. 385). We agree that it is imperative to understand the current state of gender inequity in our field while also actively working toward achieving gender equity. This article attempts to inspire each and every individual in I-O psychology to feel a personal responsibility to engage in behaviors that reduce gender disparities in our field. Although women are normatively the focus in fights for gender equity, men should be equal partners in these efforts. In this commentary, we focus on the contributions that male allies in I-O psychology can make in fostering gender equity. To be clear, we are not claiming that women need to be rescued by men; however, we do believe that I-O psychology can achieve the greatest progress toward gender equity when both women and men engage in supportive efforts. As Emma Watson said in her 2014 United Nations speech, “How can we affect change in the world when only half of it is invited or feel welcome to participate in the conversation?” (UN Women, 2014). In times when political leaders and national laws may fail women, it is crucial that local communities—like the I-O community—adopt a clear stance in promoting gender equity. In this commentary, we define allyship, discuss the importance of male allies, suggest ways in which male allies can help promote gender equity in I-O psychology, and consider potential barriers to male allyship and ways to overcome them. The strategies that we propose are by no means exhaustive; rather, they are suggestions for how to initiate a larger movement.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 389 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20 (4), 441–464.Google Scholar
Anderson, V. N. (2009). What's in a label? Judgments of feminist men and feminist women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33 (2), 206–215.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103 (1), 84–103.Google Scholar
Brands, R. A., & Fernandez-Mateo, I. (2017). Leaning out: How negative recruitment experiences shape women's decisions to compete for executive roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62 (3), 405–442.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62 (8), 728–738.Google Scholar
Castilla, E. J. (2015). Accounting for the gap: A firm study manipulating organizational accountability and transparency in pay decisions. Organization Science, 26 (2), 311–333.Google Scholar
Czopp, A. M., & Monteith, M. J. (2003). Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (4), 532–544.Google Scholar
Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8 (4), 377–383.Google Scholar
DiDonato, T. E., Ullrich, J., & Krueger, J. I. (2011). Social perception as induction and inference: An integrative model of intergroup differentiation, ingroup favoritism, and differential accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100 (1), 66–83.Google Scholar
Diehl, A. B., & Dzubinski, L. M. (2016). Making the invisible visible: A cross-sector analysis of gender-based leadership barriers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 27 (2), 181–206.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (1), 62–68.Google Scholar
Drury, B. J., & Kaiser, C. R. (2014). Allies against sexism: The role of men in confronting sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 70 (4), 637–652.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85 (9), 62–71.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109 (3), 573–598.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17 (3), 306–315.Google Scholar
Evans, N. J., & Wall, V. A. (Eds.). (1991). Beyond tolerance: Gays, lesbians, and bisexuals on campus. Alexandria, VA: American College Personnel Association.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. M., Ryan, A. M., & Snoeyink, M. (2018). How are we doing? An examination of gender representation in I-O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11 (3), 369–388.Google Scholar
Green, C. D. (2017). Publish and perish: Psychology's most prolific authors are not always the ones we remember. American Journal of Psychology, 130 (1), 105–119.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. B. (2017). Stigma and stigma by association in perceptions of straight allies. Journal of LGBT Youth, 14 (4), 345–358.Google Scholar
Hazler, R. J. (1996). Bystanders: An overlooked factor in peer on peer abuse. Journal for the Professional Counselor, 11 (2), 11–21.Google Scholar
Hebl, M. R., & Mannix, L. M. (2003). The weight of obesity in evaluating others: A mere proximity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (1), 28–38.Google Scholar
Hekman, D. R., Johnson, S. K., Foo, M.-D., & Yang, W. (2017). Does diversity-valuing behavior result in diminished performance ratings for non-white and female leaders? Academy of Management Journal, 60 (2), 771–797.Google Scholar
Ji, P., Du Bois, S. N., & Finnessy, P. (2009). An academic course that teaches heterosexual students to be allies to LGBT communities: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 21 (4), 402–429.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. K., Hekman, D. R., & Chan, E. T. (2016). If there's only one woman in your candidate pool, there's statistically no chance she'll be hired. Harvard Business Review, 26 (4). Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/04/if-theres-only-one-woman-in-your-candidate-pool-theres-statistically-no-chance-shell-be-hiredGoogle Scholar
Keller, J. R. (2015). Markets, networks and internal mobility: The allocation of human resources within contemporary organizations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Kilmartin, C., Semelsberger, R., Dye, S., Boggs, E., & Kolar, D. (2015). A behavior intervention to reduce sexism in college men. Gender Issues, 32 (2), 97–110.Google Scholar
Kray, L. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Thompson, L. (2002). Reversing the gender gap in negotiations: An exploration of stereotype regeneration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87 (2), 386–409.Google Scholar
Kugler, K. G., Reif, J. A. M., Kaschner, T., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2018). Gender differences in the initiation of negotiations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144 (2), 198–222.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2017). Ethics and values in industrial-organizational psychology. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Lim, S., & Cortina, L. M. (2005). Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: The interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (3), 483–496.Google Scholar
Madera, J. M., Hebl, M. R., & Martin, R. C. (2009). Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (6), 1591–1599.Google Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27 (1), 415–444.Google Scholar
Miller, A. N., Taylor, S. G., & Bedeian, A. G. (2011). Publish or perish: Academic life as management faculty live it. Career Development International, 16 (5), 422–445.Google Scholar
Motyl, M., Demos, A. P., Carsel, T. S., Hanson, B. E., Melton, Z. J., Mueller, A. B., . . . & Yantis, C. (2017). The state of social and personality science: Rotten to the core, not so bad, getting better, or getting worse? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113 (1), 34–58.Google Scholar
Nittrouer, C. L., Hebl, M. R., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R. C., Lane, D. M., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115 (1), 104–108.Google Scholar
O'Meara, K., Kuvaeva, A., Nyunt, G., Waugaman, C., & Jackson, R. (2017). Asked more often: Gender differences in faculty workload in research universities and the work interactions that shape them. American Educational Research Journal, 54 (6), 1154–1186.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2015, November 4). Raising kids and running a household: How working parents share the load. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/11/04/raising-kids-and-running-a-household-how-working-parents-share-the-load/Google Scholar
Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62 (5), 673–693.Google Scholar
Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Monroe, A. E. (2012). The infection of bad company: Stigma by association. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102 (2), 224–241.Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A., Mescher, K., & Moss-Racusin, C. A. (2013). Reactions to gender egalitarian men: Perceived feminization due to stigma-by-association. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations: GPIR, 16 (5), 572–599.Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48 (1), 165–179.Google Scholar
Sabat, I. E., Lindsey, A. P., Membere, A., Anderson, A., Ahmad, A., King, E., & Bolunmez, B. (2014). Invisible disabilities: Unique strategies for workplace allies. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7 (2), 259–265.Google Scholar
Sherf, E. N., Tangirala, S., & Weber, K. C. (2017). It is not my place! Psychological standing and men's voice and participation in gender-parity initiatives. Organization Science, 28 (2), 193–210.Google Scholar
Small, D. A., Gelfand, M., Babcock, L., & Gettman, H. (2007). Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93 (4), 600–613.Google Scholar
Stevens, C. K., Bavetta, A. G., & Gist, M. E. (1993). Gender differences in the acquisition of salary negotiation skills: The role of goals, self-efficacy, and perceived control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (5), 723–735.Google Scholar
Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Walters, A. E. (1999). Gender differences in negotiation outcome: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 52 (3), 653–677.Google Scholar
Sue, D. W. (2017) The challenges of becoming a white ally. The Counseling Psychologist, 45 (5), 706–716.Google Scholar
UN Women. (2014 September 20). Emma Watson: Gender equality is your issue too. Retrieved from http://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2014/9/emma-watson-gender-equality-is-your-issue-tooGoogle Scholar