Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T22:23:48.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

At the frontier of teaching and practice: Relevant issues for nontraditional undergraduate I-O psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2021

Chelsea A. LeNoble Open the ORCID record for Chelsea A. LeNoble [Opens in a new window]  and
Donna L. Roberts
Chelsea A. LeNoble*
Affiliation:
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Donna L. Roberts
Affiliation:
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
*
*Corresponding Author: lenoblec@erau.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 487 - 491
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, P. M. (2006). Virtual teamwork in very large undergraduate classes. Computers & Education, 47(2), 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, G. R. (2011). Enhancing effectiveness on virtual teams: Understanding why traditional team skills are insufficient. Journal of Business Communication, 48(2), 186–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. D., Suriya, C., Yoon, S. W., Berrett, J. V., & La Fleur, J. (2002). Team development and group processes of virtual learning teams. Computers & Education, 39(4), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kath, L., Salter, N., Bachiochi, P., Brown, K., & Hebl, M. (2021). Teaching I-O psychology to undergraduate students: Do we practice what we preach? Industrial Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(4), 443–460.Google Scholar
Konak, A., Kulturel-Konak, S., & Cheung, G. W. (2019). Teamwork attitudes, interest and self-efficacy between online and face-to-face information technology students. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 25(5/6), 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortagus, J. C. (2017). From the periphery to prominence: An examination of the changing profile of online students in American higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 32, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saghafian, M., & O’Neill, D. K. (2018). A phenomenological study of teamwork in online and face-to-face student teams. Higher Education, 75(1), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Interdisciplinary problem-based learning: An alternative to traditional majors and minors. Liberal Education, 94(1), 12–17.Google Scholar
Wilson, L., Ho, S., & Brookes, R. H. (2018). Student perceptions of teamwork within assessment tasks in undergraduate science degrees. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 786–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar