Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T05:43:38.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unproctored Internet Testing: Practical, Legal, and Ethical Concerns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Kenneth Pearlman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 14 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073.10.1037/0003-066X.57.12.1060Google Scholar
Anderson, N., & Ostroff, C. (1997). Selection as socialization. In Anderson, N. & Herriot, P. (Eds.), International handbook of selection and assessment (pp. 413–440). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bartram, D. (2006). Testing on the internet: Issues, challenges and opportunities in the field of occupational assessment. In Bartram, D. & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.), Computer-based testing and the internet: Issues and advances (pp. 13–37). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Civil Service Commission, Department of Labor, & Department of Justice. (1978). Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 43, 38295–38309.Google Scholar
Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639–683.10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00003.xGoogle Scholar
Naglieri, J. A., Drasgow, F., Schmit, M., Handler, L., Prifitera, A., Margolis, A., et al. (2003). Psychological testing on the internet: New problems, old issues (Report of the Task Force on Psychological Testing on the Internet). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2003). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Bowling Green, OH: Author.Google Scholar
Tippins, N. T., Beaty, J., Drasgow, F., Gibson, W. M., Pearlman, K., Segall, D. O., et al. (2006). Unproctored internet testing in employment settings. Personnel Psychology, 59, 189–225.10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00909.xGoogle Scholar