No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Multistage Artifact Correction: An Illustration With Structured Employment Interviews
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 April 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Commentaries
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014
References
Alexander, R. A., Carson, K. P., Alliger, G. M., & Carr, L. (1987). Correcting doubly truncated correlations: An improved approximation for correcting the bivariate normal correlation when truncation has occurred on both variables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 309–315. doi: 10.1177/0013164487472002Google Scholar
Callender, J. C., & Osburn, H. G. (1980). Development and test of a new model for validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 543–558. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.65.5.543Google Scholar
Campion, M. A., Campion, J. E., & Hudson, J. P. Jr. (1994). Structured interviewing: A note on incremental validity and alternative question types. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 998–1002. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.998Google Scholar
Campion, M. A., Pursell, E. D., & Brown, B. K. (1988). Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 41, 25–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00630.xGoogle Scholar
Conway, J. M., Jako, R. A., & Goodman, D. F. (1995). A meta-analysis of interrater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 565–579. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.5.565Google Scholar
Guion, R. M. (1998). Assessment, measurement, and prediction for personnel decisions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Huffcutt, A. I., Culbertson, S. S., & Weyhrauch, W. S. (2013). Employment interview reliability: New meta-analytic estimates by structured and format. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 264–276. doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12036Google Scholar
Huffcutt, A. I., Culbertson, S. S., & Weyhrauch, W. S. (2014). Moving forward indirectly: Reanalyzing the validity of employment interview with indirect range restriction methodology. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22, 297–309.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Le, H. (2006). Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 594–612. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.594Google Scholar
Latham, G. P., & Saari, L. M. (1984). Do people do what they say? Further studies on the situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 569–573. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.69.4.569Google Scholar
Le, H., & Schmidt, F. L. (2006). Correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis: Testing a new meta-analytic procedure. Psychological Methods, 11, 416–438. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.416Google Scholar
LeBreton, J. M., Burgess, J. R. D., Kaiser, R. B., Atchley, E. K. P., & James, L. R. (2003). The restriction of variance hypothesis and interrater reliability and agreement: Are ratings from multiple sources really dissimilar? Organizational Research Methods, 6, 80–128. doi: 10.1177/1094428102239427Google Scholar
LeBreton, J. M., Scherer, K. T., & James, L. R. (2014). Corrections for criterion reliability in validity generalization: A false prophet in a land of suspended judgment. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(4), 478–500.Google Scholar
Pulakos, E. D., & Schmidt, N. (1995). Experience-based and situational interview questions: Studies of validity. Personnel Psychology, 48, 289–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01758.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, P. L., & Campion, J. E. (1992). An analysis of the predictive power of the panel interview and pre-employment tests. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 51–60. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00483.xGoogle Scholar
Sackett, P. R., Laczo, R. M., & Arvey, R. D. (2002). The effects of range restriction on estimates of criterion interrater reliability: Implications for validation research. Personnel Psychology, 55, 807–825. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00130.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, J. P. (2005). Multi-source perspectives of self-esteem, performance ratings, and source agreement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 464–482. doi: 10.1108/02683940510615424Google Scholar
Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557–574. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.557Google Scholar
Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F. L., & Ones, D. S. (2005). Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 108–131. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.108Google Scholar