Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-xkcpr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:48:36.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Waste Management Inc. v. United Mexican States (No. 2)

ICSID (Arbitration Tribunal).  26 September 2001 ; 26 June 2002 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

icsid (Additional Facility) — Rules — Venue of arbitration — Relevant factors — Neutrality of forum — Applicability of New York or Panama Conventions — Differences between two Conventions — Positions taken by Government of Canada in earlier proceedings — Whether relevant — Convenience of parties and counsel — nafta Articles 1122, 1130 — Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules, Articles 20, 21

nafta — Chapter 11 — First arbitration commenced without valid waiver under Article 1121(2)(b) — First Tribunal deciding that it lacked jurisdiction over the claim — Whether new proceedings permissible — nafta Articles 1120, 1121

Arbitration — Res judicata — Decision denying jurisdiction of first Tribunal — Whether precluding new arbitration on same claim — Interpretation of first Tribunal’s decision — nafta Article 1136 — icsid (Additional Facility) Rules, Article 53(4)

Arbitration — Abuse of process — Successive arbitrations of same claim — Whether Tribunal has inherent power to stay proceedings — No evidence of lack of bona fides — Second arbitration allowed

Costs — Costs and expenses — Unsuccessful jurisdictional objection — Whether Respondent should be required to pay costs and expenses in any event — Extent of Tribunal’s discretion

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)