Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T22:08:09.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SPP (Middle East) Limited and Southern Pacific Properties Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt and Egyptian General Company for Tourism and Hotels

International Chamber of Commerce, Court of Arbitration.  11 March 1983 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Arbitration — Agreement to arbitrate — Parties to agreement — Contract between State-owned entity and foreign company providing for arbitration Contract countersigned by minister — Local law providing for international arbitration — Whether State becomes party to agreement countersigned by minister — Negotiating history of agreement — Whether local law and agreement provides State’s consent to arbitrate

State immunity — Waiver — Agreement to arbitrate — Whether State’s agreement to international arbitration amounts to waiver of immunity — State contract providing for icc arbitration

Parties — To icc arbitration proceedings — Contract between State-owned entity and foreign company providing for icc arbitration countersigned by minister — Whether State party to contract Contract

Applicable law — Proper law of contract — Contract between State-owned entity and foreign company — Contract subject to local law — Whether local law deemed to include principles of international law — Pacta sunt servanda — Principle of just compensation for expropriation — icsid Convention — Whether ratification of Convention by State indicates intention to abide by certain international law principles — Force majeure — Whether State-owned company under control of State may invoke force majeure clause

Jurisdiction — Of arbitration tribunal — Competence of tribunal to determine own jurisdiction

Expropriation — State-owned entity — Conclusion of concession with foreign private company — Cancellation of concession by State — Contractual limitations upon State’s powers of expropriation — Compensation Valuation of investment

State responsibility — For breaches of contract — Contract concluded by State-owned entity — Contract countersigned by minister — Whether State responsible as a party to contract

Damages — Measure of damages — Breach of State contract — Damnum emergens and lucrum cessans — Loss which could be foreseen at date of contract — Method of assessment — Discounted cash flow — Value of investment and incremental increases

Costs — icc arbitration — Costs of arbitration and legal costs — Claimant succeeding only in part — Percentage of costs recoverable — Effect of dismissal of counterclaim

Procedure — icc arbitration — Arbitrator refusing to sign award

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)