Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-fb4gq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:46:29.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Saluka Investments BV v. Czech Republic

ICSID (Arbitration Tribunal).  07 May 2004 ; 17 March 2006 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2020

Get access

Abstract

Procedure — Counterclaim — Whether requiring involvement of third party — Whether counterclaim closely connected to primary investment dispute

Jurisdiction — Acquisition of shares — Whether acquisition of shares an “investment” — Investor — Whether good faith required — Whether real and continuous social and economic links required

Treaties — BIT — Whether Tribunal having jurisdiction over dispute — Whether Czech Republic acting in breach of BIT — Expropriation — Forced administration of bank — Whether indirect expropriation — Public financial assistance — Refusal to negotiate in good faith — Predictable and transparent framework — Government official leaking negative information — Suspension of trading of shares — Whether breach of obligation to treat fairly and equitably — Whether unreasonable and discriminatory measures — Whether failure to prevent unjust enrichment — Whether breach of non-impairment obligation — Whether breach of obligation to provide full security and protection — Whether Czech Republic acting in breach of Articles 3 and 5 of BIT — Whether Czech Republic liable for damages — Appropriate redress for breach and questions of quantum for second phase of arbitration

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)