Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T14:48:34.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Petrobart Limited v. Kyrgyz Republic

ICSID (Arbitration Tribunal).  29 March 2005 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Jurisdiction — Procedure — Agreement between the parties not to raise further objections — Objection subsequently made — Whether merits of objection requiring consideration by Tribunal

Jurisdiction — Provisional application — Treaty provisionally applied by State including to a specified external territory — Subsequent instrument of ratification not extending to the external territory — Provisional application not expressly terminated for the territory — Whether treaty continuing to apply provisionally

Jurisdiction — Domestic proceedings dealing with domestic law claim — Whether principles of res judicata or collateral estoppel applicable to related but distinct treaty claim

Jurisdiction — “Investor” — “Investment” — Whether right conferred by contract to undertake economic activity an investment

Fair and equitable treatment — Transfer of assets of State organ to detriment of investor — Government intervention in enforcement proceedings to stay execution — Whether fair and equitable treatment — Whether violation of obligation to provide effective enforcement of rights

Expropriation — De facto expropriation — Measures not directed at transfer of value of investment

Remedies — Compensation — Contract no longer being performed — Whether specific performance practical — Damages for payment for delivered goods — Lost profits — Outlays and expenses — Costs — Interest

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)