Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T16:53:21.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Can Feminist Epistemology Do for Surgery?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Mary Jean Walker  and
Wendy Rogers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Surgery is an important part of contemporary health care, but currently much of surgery lacks a strong evidence base. Uptake of evidence‐based medicine (EBM) methods within surgical research and among practitioners has been slow compared with other areas of medicine. Although this is often viewed as arising from practical and cultural barriers, it also reflects a lack of epistemic fit between EBM research methods and surgical practice. In this paper we discuss some epistemic challenges in surgery relating to this lack of fit, and investigate how resources from feminist epistemology can help to characterize them. We point to ways in which these epistemic challenges may be addressed by gathering and disseminating evidence about what works in surgery using methods that are contextual, pluralistic, and sensitive to hierarchies.

Type
Open Issue Content
Information
Hypatia , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , Spring 2014 , pp. 404 - 421
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project grant (DP120101092) and a Macquarie University Research Development Grant. The funders did not have any input into or control over the content of this article. We thank Cynthia Townley, Katrina Hutchison, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier drafts of the paper.

References

Anderson, E. 2011. Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-epistemology/ (accessed March 13, 2012).Google Scholar
Ashcroft, R. 2004. Current epistemological problems in evidence based medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2): 131–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, C., Wray, N., Jarman, A., Kolman, J., Wenner, D., and Brody, B. 2009. Ethics and methods in surgical trials. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (9): 579–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkun, J., Aronson, J., Feldman, L., Maddern, G., and Strasberg, S. 2009. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet 374 (9695): 1089–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, R. H. 2009. Why Johnny cannot operate. Surgery 146 (4): 533–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergin, L. 2002. Testimony, epistemic difference, and privilege: How feminist epistemology can improve our understanding of the communication of knowledge. Social Epistemology 16 (3): 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkmeyer, J., Sharp, S., Finlayson, S., Fisher, E., and Wennberg, J. 1998. Variation profiles of common surgical procedures. Surgery 124 (5): 917–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosk, C., and Frader, J. 2006. It's not easy wearing green: The art of surgical innovation and the science of clinical trials. In Ethical Guidelines for Innovative Surgery, ed. Reitsma, A. M. and Moreno, J. D.Hagerstown, Md.: University Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Brattheim, B., Faxvaag, A., and Tjora, A. 2011. Getting the aorta pants in place: A “community of guidance” in the evolving practice of vascular implant surgery. Health 15 (5): 441–58.Google ScholarPubMed
Cartwright, N. 2007. Are RCTs the gold standard? BioSocieties 2 (Special Issue): 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N. 2010. What are randomised controlled trials good for? Philosophical Studies 147 (1): 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassell, J. 1998. The woman in the surgeon's body. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ceci, C. 2004. Nursing, knowledge and power: A case analysis. Social Science and Medicine 59 (9): 1879–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Churchman, J. J., and Doherty, C. 2010. Nurses’ views on challenging doctors’ practice in an acute hospital. Nursing Standard 24 (40): 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, A. 1972. Effectiveness and efficiency: Random reflections on health services. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.Google Scholar
Code, L. 1995. Rhetorical spaces. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. 2012. How safe are metal‐on‐metal hip implants? British Medical Journal 344:e1410. http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e1410 (accessed June 7, 2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colditz, G. A., Miller, J., and Mosteller, F. 1988. The effect of study design on gain in evaluations of new treatments in medicine and surgery. Drug Information Journal 22 (3): 343–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalmiya, V., and Alcoff, L. 1993. Are “old wives’ tales” justified? In Feminist Epistemologies, ed. Alcoff, L. and Potter, E.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Diener, M., Wolff, R., von Elm, E., Rahbari, N., Mavergames, C., Knaebel, H.‐P., Seiler, C., and Antes, G. 2009. Can decision making in general surgery be based on evidence? An empirical study of Cochrane Reviews. Surgery 146 (3): 444–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dreyer, N. A. 2011. Making observational studies count: Shaping the future of comparative effectiveness research epidemiology. Epidemiology 22 (3): 295–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Editorial. 1986. The epistemology of surgery. Lancet 327 (8482): 656–57.Google Scholar
Emamaullee, J., Lyons, M., Berdan, E., and Bazzarelli, A. 2012. Women leaders in surgery: Past, present, and future. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons 97 (8): 23–29.Google Scholar
Ferlie, E., Wood, M., and Fitzgerald, L. 1999. Some limits to evidence‐based medicine: A case study from elective orthopaedics. Quality in Health Care 8 (2): 99–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fricker, M. 1998. Rational authority and social power: Towards a truly social epistemology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (2): 159–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garas, G. G., Ibrahim, A., Ashrafian, H., Ahmed, K., Patel, V., Okabayashi, K., Skapinakis, P., Darzi, A., and Athanasiou, T. 2012. Evidence‐based surgery: Barriers, solutions, and the role of evidence synthesis. World Journal of Surgery 36 (8): 1723–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grasswick, H. 2004. Individuals‐in‐communities: The search for a feminist model of epistemic subjects. Hypatia 19 (3): 85–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasswick, H. 2008a. Feminist social epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/ (accessed April 20, 2012).Google Scholar
Grasswick, H. 2008b. From feminist thinking to ecological thinking: Determining the bounds of community. Hypatia 23 (1): 150–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, S. E., Holman, C. D., Hendrie, D. V., and Spilsbury, K. 2004. Unequal access to breast‐conserving surgery in Western Australia 1982–2000. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 74 (6): 413–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harding, S. 1991. Whose science, whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, S. 1993. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is strong objectivity? In Feminist Epistemologies, ed. Alcoff, L. and Potter, E.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haynes, A. S., Derrick, G., Chapman, S., Redman, S., Hall, W., Gillespie, J., and Sturk, H. 2011. From “our world” to the “real world”: Exploring the views and behaviour of policy‐influential Australian public health researchers. Social Science and Medicine 72 (7): 1047–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herxheimer, A., and Ziebland, S. 2003. DIPEx: Fresh insights for medical practice. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 96 (5): 209–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, S. G. 2006. Recognizing tacit knowledge in medical epistemology. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3): 187–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton, R. 1996. Surgical research or comic opera: Questions, but few answers. Lancet 374 (9007): 984–85.Google Scholar
Howes, N., Chagla, L., Thorpe, M., and McCulloch, P. 1997. Surgical practice is evidence based. British Journal of Surgery 84 (9): 1220–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchison, K., and Rogers, W. A. 2012. Challenging the epistemological foundations of EBM: What kind of knowledge does clinical practice require? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (5): 984–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, J., Rogers, W. A., and Jeffree, R. 2012. The controversy over vertebroplasty: An analysis of the debate and proposals for a way forward. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology 56 (4): 449–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitto, S., Petrovic, A, Gruen, R., and Smith, J. 2011. Evidence‐based medicine training and implementation in surgery: The role of surgical cultures. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (4): 819–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M. 2009. The basis of medical knowledge: Judgement, objectivity and the history of ideas. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6): 935–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macklin, R. 1999. The ethical problems with sham surgery in clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine 341 (13): 992–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malterud, K. 1995. The legitimacy of clinical knowledge: Towards a medical epistemology embracing the art of medicine. Theoretical Medicine 16 (2): 183–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malterud, K. 1999. The (gendered) construction of diagnosis interpretation of medical signs in women patients. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (3): 275–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCulloch, P., Altman, D., Campbell, W., Flum, D., Glasziou, P., Marshall, J., and Nicholl, J. 2009. No surgical innovation without evaluation: The IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374 (9695): 1105–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, F. G. 2003. Sham surgery: An ethical analysis. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4): 41–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moseley, J. B., O'Malley, K., Petersen, N., Menke, T., Brody, B., Kuykendall, H., Hollingsworth, J., Ashton, C., and Wray, N. 2002. A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. New England Journal of Medicine 347 (2): 81–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NHMRC. 2000. How to put the evidence into practice: Implementation and dissemination strategies. Canberra, Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. H. 1993. Epistemological communities. In Feminist Epistemologies, ed. Alcoff, L. and Potter, E.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oransky, I. 2008. Michael E. DeBakey. Lancet 372 (9638): 530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, C. 2002. Contingency in everyday surgical work. Sociology of Health and Illness 24 (4): 369–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, E. F. 1993. Gender and epistemic negotiation. In Feminist Epistemologies, ed. Alcoff, L. and Potter, E.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rawlins, M. 2008. De testimonio: On the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions. Clinical Medicine 8 (6): 579–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W., Gray, J., Haynes, R., and Richardson, W. 1996. Evidence‐based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal 312 (7023): 71–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slim, K., Panis, Y., and Chipponi, J. 2004. Half of the current practice of gastrointestinal surgery is against the evidence: A survey of the French Society of Digestive Surgery. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8 (8): 1079–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, M. J., and McLeod, R. S. 1998. Surgery and the randomised controlled trial: Past, present and future. Medical Journal of Australia 169 (7): 380–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solomon, M. 2008. Epistemological reflections on the art of medicine and narrative medicine. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 51 (3): 406–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Stirrat, G. M. 2004. Ethics and evidence based surgery. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2): 160–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wauben, L., Lange, J., and Goossens, R. 2012. Learning from aviation to improve safety in the operating room: A systematic literature review. Journal of Healthcare Engineering 3 (3): 373–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, M., Ferlie, E., and Fitzgerald, L. 1998. Achieving clinical behaviour change: A case of becoming indeterminate. Social Science and Medicine 47 (11): 1729–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed