Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:38:43.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rethinking Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

This paper argues that feminists have yet to develop a satisfactory account of power. Existing feminist accounts of power tend to have a one-sided emphasis either on power as domination or on power as empowerment. This conceptual one-sided’ ness must be overcome if feminists are to develop an account complex enough to illuminate women's diverse experiences with power. Such an account is sketched here.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Amy. 1996. Foucault on power: A theory for feminists. In Feminist Interpretations of Michel Foucault, ed. Hekman, Susan. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1969. On violence. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Connolly, William. 1983. The terms of political discourse. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Andrea. 1979. Pornography: Men possessing women. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Andrea. 1987. Intercourse. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Follett, Mary Parker. 1942. Power. In Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett, ed. Metcalf, Henry C. and Urwick, L.New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1993. Beyond the master/subject model: Reflections on Carole Pateman's Sexual Contract. Social Text 37: 173–81.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist morality: Transforming culture, society, and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Sarah Lucia. 1988. Lesbian ethics: Toward new value. Palo Alto, CA: Institute of Lesbian Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1974. Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1986. Introduction. In Power, ed. Lukes, . New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1987. Feminism unmodified. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1989. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C.B. 1973. Democratic theory: Essays in retrieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1993. Feminism and democratic community. In Democratic community: NOMOS XXXV, ed. Chapman, John and Shapiro, Ian. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1994. Using power/fighting power. Constellations 1: 5373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The sexual contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan Wallach. 1988. Gender and the politics of history. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth. 1989. The inessential woman: Problems ofexclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Wartenberg, Thomas. 1990. The form of power: From domination to transformation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar