Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T06:06:16.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Editors’ Introduction: Biomedical Technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
FEMINIST BIOTECHNOLOGIES CLUSTER
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goering, S., Holland, S., and Fryer‐Edwards, K. 2008. Transforming genetic research practices with marginalized communities: A case for responsive justice. Hastings Center Report 38 (2): 4353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haraway, D.J. 1991. Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, D.J. 1997. Modest_witness@second_millennium.femaleman©_meets_oncomouse: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holland, S. 2001. Beyond the embryo: A feminist appraisal of the embryonic stem cell debate. In The human embryonic stem cell debate, ed. Holland, S., Lebacqz, K., and Zoloth, Laurie. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, A., and Bordo, S., eds. 1989. Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
McLeod, C., and Baylis, F. 2007. Donating fresh versus frozen embryos to stem cell research: In whose interests? Bioethics 2 (9): 465–77.Google Scholar
Plumwood, V. 1994. Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Price, J., and Shildrick, M., eds. 1999. Feminist theory and the body: A reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roco, M., and Bainbridge, W.S., eds. 2003. Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology, and cognitive science. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Karen J. 2000. Ecofeminist philosophy: A western perspective on what it is and why it matters. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wendell, S. 1996. The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar